Development Intent
AtlasTower HamletsOfficersKitty Eyre
Planning Atlas›Tower Hamlets›Kitty Eyre
Case officer · Tower Hamlets Planning

Kitty Eyre.

Last recorded decision May 2022 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Tower Hamlets with an approval rate of 80% across 125 decided planning applications, spanning 12 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer125 decisions80% approvalSave
Tower Hamlets · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
125
Applications
2020–22
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%79%202182%2022
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate80% · 41st of 76
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Kitty Eyre's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Kitty Eyre decided — 96 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D.DH2Attractive streets, spaces and public realmTower Hamlets plan
34 times cited
S.DH3Heritage and the historic environmentTower Hamlets plan
29 times cited
HC1London Plan
12 times cited
D4London Plan
11 times cited
D.DH8AmenityTower Hamlets plan
11 times cited
D1London Plan
6 times cited
T6London Plan
5 times cited
NPPFNPPF
4 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
21
71%
16
81%
14
79%
14
86%
12
75%
11
82%
11
82%
11
82%
9
89%
3
100%
1
0%
1
100%
21
71%
16
81%
14
79%
Show all 12 rows
14
86%
12
75%
11
82%
11
82%
11
82%
9
89%
3
100%
1
0%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–22.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
PA/22/00067/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-08-23
PA/21/02120/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-07-27
PA/22/00067/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-08-23
PA/21/02120/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-07-27
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 125 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Stephen Kavanagh Architects
2. SHW
3. ITO Lab Ltd
4. LYONDALE
At a glance
OfficerKitty Eyre
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications125 (2020–22)
Approval rate80%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Tower Hamlets planning register and published decision notices, 2020–22. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Tower Hamlets decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.