Development Intent
Planning AtlasPlanning InspectorateTower Hamlets appealsPA/24/01229/A1
Tower Hamlets · Planning appeal · 2026-01-20

Appeal — PA/24/01229/A1

Unknown
Originating application — PA/24/01229/A1

Tower Hamlets refused PA/24/01229/A1; the applicant appealed to the Planning Inspectorate. Tower Hamlets decisions →

Winning arguments — policies cited
DP9SW1YA1EC3NSW1PIR5IR13IR10CD12B2
From the decision letter

Our ref: APP/E5900/V/24/3353754 and APP/E5900/V/24/3353755 Nona Jones DP9 Ltd 100 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5NQ Your ref: PA/24/01229/A1 and PA/24/01248/NC Sent by email only 20 January 2026 Dear Nona Jones TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 77 PLANNING (LISTED BUILDING AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990 – SECTION 12 APPLICATION MADE BY CHINESE EMBASSY IN THE UK ROYAL MINT COURT, LONDON, EC3N 4QN APPLICATION REFS: PA/24/01229/A1 and PA/24/01248/NC This decision was made by the Secretary of State 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of Claire Searson MSc PGDip BSc (Hons) MRTPI IHBC, who held a public local inquiry between 11 February and 19 February 2025 into your client’s applications for: Planning permission Redevelopment of the site to provide an embassy (Sui Generis use class), involving the refurbishment and restoratio…

At a glance
OutcomeUnknown
ApplicationPA/24/01229/A1
Appeal ref3353754
Decided2026-01-20
The inspector
Claire Searson MSc PGDip

The Planning Inspectorate inspector who decided this appeal.

From the Planning Inspectorate's published decision letter for appeal 3353754. The originating application reference and site are extracted from the letter. “Winning arguments” are the development-plan policies the inspector cited.