Development Intent
Planning AtlasSutton28
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Sutton · Local Plan · Policy

28 — Character and Design.

How Sutton actually applies 28: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

28 is a published Sutton planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Sutton Local Plan (adopted)

Sutton · 28
Where 28 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~369
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
3,760
times cited
in parsed decision notices
appeal survival
no PINS appeal decisions cite it
18 of 18
officer reach
100% of officers recorded in this period
Cheam
top hotspot ward
369 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue 28 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

28 appears most often in Cheam, Carshalton South & Clockhouse, Carshalton Central. It appears across 18 of 18 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
81%
in approvals
3,041 citations
19%
in refusals
718 citations

This shows the decision reports in which 28 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 1 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why 28 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance

No Planning Inspectorate appeal decisions on record cite 28. When one lands (the appeals table refreshes each weekday), the dismissed/allowed record appears here — never estimated.

Related — follow the thread
Sutton
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Sutton's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Sutton decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.