Development Intent
Planning AtlasSuttonWallington SouthApplication
Planning Application

DM2025/01590

105 Stafford Road Wallington SM6 9AP

Full / Other PlanningWallington South wardPlanning History: Planning Application Reference: DM2022/005
Submission
22 Dec 2025
Target
12 Mar 2026
Decision
20 May 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
20 May 2026
Decided by Ben Rochford under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Completion and retention of change of use from Class E (Industrial) to Sui Generis (Car Wash) involving erection a canopy, installation of external staircase, alterations to fenestrations and new boundary treatment.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The retrospective change of use to a Sui Generis car wash represents an inappropriate and incompatible use of this backland site, which directly borders and shares a constrained primary access with designated Site Allocation S10. By reason of the noise, water overspray, and vehicular trip generation associated with the unauthorised use, the development creates an environment that is fundamentally incompatible with, and severely prejudices the delivery of, the adjacent residential site allocation. Consequently, the development frustrates the Council's strategic housing delivery objectives, contrary to Policy 1 (Sustainable Growth) and Policy 40 (Site Allocations - specifically Allocation S10) of the Sutton Local Plan 2018, and Policy H1 of the London Plan 2021.

Reason 2

The unauthorised car wash operation results in significant, demonstrable, and ongoing harm to the residential amenity of adjoining and nearby occupiers. The intensive nature of the commercial activities specifically the continuous use of high-pressure jet washers, industrial vacuums, and associated vehicular movements, generates unacceptable levels of noise and disturbance that adversely impact the habitable rooms and private amenity spaces of neighbouring properties. Furthermore, the failure to contain water overspray within the site boundaries exacerbates this nuisance. The development is therefore contrary to Policy 29 (Protecting Amenity) and Policy 34 (Environmental Protection) of the Sutton Local Plan 2018, and Policy D14 (Noise) of the London Plan 2021.

Reason 3

The unauthorised development introduces an unacceptable risk to highway and pedestrian safety and severely compromises the efficiency of the public transport network. The intensive vehicular activity generated by the use, combined with the restricted sightlines at the site egress and its immediate proximity to a heavily utilised bus stop, results in hazardous vehicle conflicts. Furthermore, the lack of adequate on-site vehicle queuing capacity results in indiscriminate overspill parking and queuing on the public highway, which disrupts the free flow of traffic and delays bus operations. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy 36 (Transport Impact) of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and Policy T4 (Assessing and mitigating transport impacts) of the London Plan 2021.

Reason 4

The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the site benefits from adequate on-site drainage provision or flood risk mitigation. In the absence of an acceptable Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) strategy and technical run-off calculations, the continual discharge of surface water from the commercial washing operations, compounded during storm events, leads to a material increase in flood risk for adjacent land. Furthermore, the unregulated discharge of water onto the public highway creates hazardous road conditions, particularly during winter months. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy 32 (Flood Risk and Sustainable Drainage) of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and Policy SI 13 (Sustainable drainage) of the London Plan 2021.

Reason 5

The retrospective commercial use poses an unacceptable and unmitigated risk to local water quality. The applicant has failed to demonstrate the installation of appropriate trade effluent infrastructure, such as adequately sized oil and silt interceptors. Consequently, there is an ongoing risk of hazardous contaminants, including detergents, chemical solvents, and silt, discharging directly into the surface water drainage system and wider watercourses. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy 34 (Environmental Protection) of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and Policy SI 5 (Water infrastructure) of the London Plan 2021.

Policies cited
H1
Parties
Applicant
Besard Koromani
Timeline
22 Dec 2025
Application submitted
9 Jan 2026
Application validated
20 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 26
125 of 26
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL20 May 2026View ↗
OFFICER REPORT20 May 2026View ↗
MR PATRICK WHITTER2 Mar 2026View ↗
MR JIFU ZUO3 Feb 2026View ↗
Site Notice30 Jan 2026View ↗
MX POLLUTION CONTROL26 Jan 2026View ↗
SR03 REV.A9 Jan 2026View ↗
APPLICATION FORM PUBLIC22 Dec 2025View ↗
SR0122 Dec 2025View ↗
SR0222 Dec 2025View ↗
SR0422 Dec 2025View ↗
SR0622 Dec 2025View ↗
SR0822 Dec 2025View ↗
SR0922 Dec 2025View ↗
SR0522 Dec 2025View ↗
SR0722 Dec 2025View ↗
SR1222 Dec 2025View ↗
SR1322 Dec 2025View ↗
SR1522 Dec 2025View ↗
SR1422 Dec 2025View ↗
SR1122 Dec 2025View ↗
SR1622 Dec 2025View ↗
SR1022 Dec 2025View ↗
SR0522 Dec 2025View ↗
PLANNING STATEMENT22 Dec 2025View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Sutton planning register.
Summary
Reference
DM2025/01590
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Besard Koromani
Submitted
22 Dec 2025
Decision date
20 May 2026
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
21
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 13 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
15
In support
1
Total comments
16