Development Intent
Planning AtlasSuttonCarshalton CentralApplication
Planning Application

DM2023/01097

27 - 29 High Street Carshalton SM5 3AX

Full / Other PlanningCarshalton Central wardConservation Areas: Carshalton Village
Submission
7 Jul 2023
Target
30 Nov 2023
Decision
4 Apr 2024
Outcome
Refused
Committee decisionRefused
4 Apr 2024
Determined by the planning committee
Loading map…
Scheme description

Demolition of existing single storey building and erection of a three storey building to provide two commercial units (Class E) at ground floor and 9 self contained residential units (Class C3) at first and second floor with associated amenity areas, provision of off-street car parking at rear, refuse and cycle storage and landscaping.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposal would fail to provide a minimum of 50% of all dwellings on the site as having three bedrooms or more and there are no obvious restrictions that would make the site unsuitable for a housing mix which would meet this policy requirement. Thus, the proposed development would be contrary to the requirements of Policy 9 of the Sutton Local Plan and is therefore unacceptable in principle.

Reason 2

The proposal development, by reason of its unsympathetic and incongruous design, excessive height, bulk, massing and materials, would fail to preserve and enhance the Carshalton Village Conservation Area and would cause substantial harm to its character, contrary to Section 16 of the NPPF 2023, Policies D1, D3, D4, D8, and HC1 of the London Plan, Policies 28 and 30 of the Local Plan 2018, Sutton's Urban Design Guide SPD 14 and the Carshalton Village Conservation Area Appraisal 2019.

Reason 3

The proposal would result in an unacceptably adverse impact on neighbour amenity to the occupants of The Forge, 1-4 The Green and 9 Beacon Grove, by way of loss of outlook, light, privacy and an undue sense of enclosure, and as such the proposal is considered to be contrary to Policy 29 of the Local Plan.

Reason 4

The proposal would fail to deliver an acceptable standard of accommodation for the future occupiers by way of failing to provide an appropriate outlook and dual aspect and adequate private amenity space to a number of the proposed dwellings, contrary to Policy 9 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021 and the guidance Urban Design Guide SPD14.

Reason 5

The inadequate width of the proposed access road means that the proposal would result in an unacceptably adverse impact on the safe and efficient operation of the public highway and therefore would be contrary to Policy 36 of the Sutton Local Plan.

Reason 6

The proposed development would result in an unacceptable loss of trees of value within the Carshalton Village Conservation Area, and would fail to provide high quality landscaping by design, contrary to Policies 28 and 30 of the Sutton Local Plan.

Reason 7

In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the proposed development would result in a net loss of biodiversity on site contrary to Policy 26 of the Sutton Local Plan.

Reason 8

The application has failed to demonstrate that it would provide necessary reductions in CO2 emissions by way of renewable energy and would achieve appropriate water efficiency, contrary to Policies 31 and 33 of the Sutton Local Plan.

Reason 9

The proposed development is considered unacceptable in terms of the lack of a completed S106 agreement, contrary to Policies T4, T6 and DF1 of the London Plan 2021, Policies 36 and 37 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and Sutton's Supplementary Planning Document 5 Planning Obligations.

Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 9
HC1
Local Plan 28
Local Plan 30
NPPF
Local Plan 29
D6
Sutton Local Plan 36
Sutton Local Plan 28
Sutton Local Plan 30
Sutton Local Plan 26
Sutton Local Plan 31
Sutton Local Plan 33
T4
T6
DF1
Sutton Local Plan 37
Parties
Applicant
Not disclosed
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Timeline
7 Jul 2023
Application submitted
30 Oct 2023
Application validated
4 Apr 2024
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal: Appeal Dismissed
Supporting documents · 46
125 of 46
Appeal Decision14 Mar 2025View ↗
COST DECISION14 Mar 2025View ↗
047/22/MS4 Apr 2024View ↗
HERITAGE APPRAISAL 2ND FEBRUARY 20244 Apr 2024View ↗
047/22/MS4 Apr 2024View ↗
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL4 Apr 2024View ↗
FURTHER WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMENTS3 Jan 2024View ↗
MR MARK BORRETT8 Dec 2023View ↗
MR MARK BORRETT7 Dec 2023View ↗
MR EDWARD BUCKTON5 Dec 2023View ↗
TFL COMMENTS23 Nov 2023View ↗
MISS ROSANNA WHICHELOE20 Nov 2023View ↗
MX POLLUTION CONTROL17 Nov 2023View ↗
Press Notice10 Nov 2023View ↗
GLAAS COMMENTS9 Nov 2023View ↗
THAMES WATER COMMENTS7 Nov 2023View ↗
MR PATRICK WHITTER6 Nov 2023View ↗
WASTE COMMENTS3 Nov 2023View ↗
047/22/MS30 Oct 2023View ↗
31229 SUDS ASSESSMENT - 27 - 29 HIGH STREET, CARSHALTON30 Oct 2023View ↗
REVISED APPLICATION FORM12 Oct 2023View ↗
DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT REV A (27.09.2023)29 Sep 2023View ↗
TS01 TRANSPORT STATEMENT29 Sep 2023View ↗
FL12401 ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT29 Sep 2023View ↗
2208/64/AIA29 Sep 2023View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Sutton planning register.
Summary
Reference
DM2023/01097
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Not disclosed
Submitted
7 Jul 2023
Decision date
4 Apr 2024
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Committee
How long, really
39
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 31 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
15
In support
0
Total comments
16