Development Intent
AtlasSouthwarkOfficersZoe Oakes
Case officer · Southwark Planning

Zoe Oakes.

Recently active — last recorded decision Mar 2025

A case officer at Southwark with an approval rate of 82% across 50 decided planning applications, spanning 18 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer50 decisions82% approvalSave
Southwark · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
50
Applications
2021–25
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%81%202386%202471%2025
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate82% · 60th of 79
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports47 officer reports parsed
25%
Approves despite concerns
of approvals record a documented reservation
32%
Negotiated approvals
approvals mentioning revisions/amendments
28%
"On balance" reports
reports using explicit balancing language
77%
Bespoke reasoning
of report text written for the case, not recited
What they write about — vs Southwark's average officer

Topic mentions per 1,000 words of their own report text (boilerplate stripped), indexed against all parsed Southwark reports. Attention, not stance.

Energy & sustainability
2.95× borough avg
Transport & parking
2.03× borough avg
Flooding & drainage
1.99× borough avg
Trees & landscape
1.92× borough avg
Noise & disturbance
0.94× borough avg

Mark = borough average (1×). Bar capped at 2×.

Assigned Zoe Oakes on a live case?What they pay attention to, how they reason, and what their reports consistently look for — so you can address it before they raise it.Subscribe to unlock →
In their own words

the carbon offset tariff has increased from �60 for every tonne CO2 emitted per year over a period of 30 years, to �95 for every tonne CO2 emitted per year over a period of 30 years

21/AP/3225

It was previously acknowledged in the determination of 18/AP/4012 that the proposal would not meet the minimum standards and that this was due to the restricted ground floor space

22/AP/0014

Measured from 47 published Southwark officer reports written by this officer, with recited policy boilerplate stripped before any counting. These describe how this officer works and writes — they are not outcome predictions. Every quote is from a named public report.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most in their own reports — times cited across 47 parsed reports. Whether refusals citing each survive appeal isn't traced per policy yet.

P14Design quality
23 times cited
P56Protection of amenity
22 times cited
P13Design of places
21 times cited
P53Cycling
21 times cited
P18Efficient use of land
19 times cited
P65Improving air
19 times cited
P68Reducing flood risk
17 times cited
P69Sustainability standards
16 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–25.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 50 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Turley
2. HGH Consulting
3. BB Partnership
4. Interpolitan Ltd
At a glance
OfficerZoe Oakes
BoroughSouthwark
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications50 (2021–25)
Approval rate82%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Southwark planning register and published decision notices, 2021–25. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Southwark decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]"How this officer decides", the policy playbook and all quotes — parsed from 47 published Southwark officer reports written by this officer, recited policy boilerplate stripped before counting; disposition text coded from their own reasoning with every quote machine-verified verbatim. Descriptive of how they work — not outcome predictions.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.