Development Intent
AtlasSouthwarkOfficersMartin Mckay
Case officer · Southwark Planning

Martin McKay.

Last recorded decision Sep 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Southwark with an approval rate of 91% across 30 decided planning applications, spanning 11 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer30 decisions91% approvalSave
Southwark · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
30
Applications
2020–21
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%88%2020100%2021
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate91% · 32nd of 79
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Martin McKay's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most across their decisions — how often each appears, and whether refusals citing it survive appeal.

In development — policy citations are coded from officer reports, and that parsing hasn't run for Southwark yet. Nothing is shown until it is real.

Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–21.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
21/AP/1509
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2021-09-13
21/AP/1508
Householder Application
Approved
2021-09-13
21/AP/1509
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2021-09-13
21/AP/1508
Householder Application
Approved
2021-09-13
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 30 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Peacock + Smith Limited
2. Adam Architecture
3. Reed Watts Ltd
4. Burgess Architects Ltd
At a glance
OfficerMartin McKay
BoroughSouthwark
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications30 (2020–21)
Approval rate91%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Southwark planning register and published decision notices, 2020–21. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Southwark decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.