Development Intent
AtlasSouthwarkCouncillorsIan_wingfield
Planning AtlasSouthwarkIan Wingfield
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · St Giles, Southwark

Ian Wingfield.

A Labour member representing St Giles in Southwark. 33% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside St Giles itself.

LabourSt Giles ward
Southwark · Ian Wingfield's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
6
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
33%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
How they intervene — by type
Ward support
4

How Ian Wingfield acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Ian Wingfield moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-09-08
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-09-08
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2023-07-05
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2023-07-05
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-09-08
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-09-08
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2023-07-05
Show all 4 rows
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2023-07-05
At a glance
PartyLabour
WardSt Giles
Planning committeeNo
CouncilSouthwark
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Southwark planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 6 of their 6 interventions (100%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.