Development Intent
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon Thames6
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Richmond Upon Thames · Local Plan · Policy

6 — Sustainable Construction Standards.

How Richmond Upon Thames actually applies 6: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

6 is a published Richmond Upon Thames planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Richmond Upon Thames Local Plan (adopted)

Richmond Upon Thames · 6
Where 6 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~4
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
15
times cited
in parsed decision notices
appeal survival
no PINS appeal decisions cite it
10 of 29
officer reach
34% of officers recorded in this period
Whitton Ward [WTT]
top hotspot ward
4 citations
What this policy is about

Policy 6 requires developments to achieve sustainable construction standards. Residential developments of 1 unit or more must complete the Sustainable Construction Checklist SPD and achieve a minimum 4-star rating under the BRE Home Quality Mark scheme. Non-residential developments of 100sqm or more must complete the Checklist SPD and achieve BREEAM standards, with new buildings over 500sqm requiring 'Outstanding' certification.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Sustainable Construction Standards

A. Developments will be required to achieve the highest standards of sustainable design and construction. Applicants will be required to complete the following: Residential development 1. Development of 1 dwelling unit or more will be required to complete the Sustainable Construction Checklist SPD. A completed Checklist must be submitted as part of the planning application. Richmond upon Thames Local Plan Track Changes Version for Environment Committee Sep 2. All new-build residential developments must achieve a four-star rating (as a minimum) under the BRE Home Quality Mark scheme. 3. Proposals for conversions or change of use to residential will be required to meet BREEAM Domestic Refurbishment ‘Outstanding’ standard or equivalent. If a developer can provide evidence from an accredited BREEAM assessor that achieving ‘Outstanding’ is not technically feasible than ‘Excellent’ would be acceptable. 4. Development that results in a new residential dwelling, including conversions, change of use, and extensions that result in a new dwelling unit, must be designed to be water efficient and reduce water consumption. Refurbishments and other non-domestic development will be expected to meet BREEAM water-efficiency credits. Residential development must not exceed a maximum water use of 105 litres per head per day (excluding the allowance of up to 5 litres for external water consumption) using the ‘Fittings Approach’ in Table 2.2 of Part G of Building Regulations. Planning conditions will be applied to new residential development to ensure that the water efficiency standards are met. will be required to incorporate water conservation measures to achieve maximum water consumption of 110 litres per person per day for homes (including an allowance of 5 litres or less per person per day for external water consumption). Non-residential development 5. Development of 100sqm or more of non-residential floor space (including changes of use, conversions, and extensions) will be required to complete the Sustainable Construction Checklist SPD. A completed Checklist has to be submitted as part of the planning application. 6. New non-residential buildings over 500sqm will be required to meet BREEAM Nondomestic New Construction ‘Outstanding’ standard or equivalent. A ‘verification stage’ certification at post occupancy stage must also be achieved, unless it can be demonstrated that this is not feasible. If a developer can provide evidence from an accredited BREEAM assessor that achieving ‘Outstanding’ is not technically feasible than ‘Excellent’ would be acceptable. 7. All major non-residential refurbishment of existing buildings and conversions over 500sqm will be required to achieve a final (post-construction) certified rating of ‘Outstanding’ under BREEAM Non-domestic Refurbishment and Fit-out ‘Outstanding’ standard or equivalent. The scope of works of the development must include a full fit-out, unless it can be demonstrated that this is not feasible. Fabric efficiency standards B.

Verbatim from the adopted Richmond Upon Thames plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
60% in approvals · 40% in refusals
15 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Whitton Ward [WTT]4
Kew Ward [KWW]3
South Richmond Ward [STR]3
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue 6 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

6 appears most often in Whitton Ward [WTT], Kew Ward [KWW], South Richmond Ward [STR]. It appears across 10 of 29 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
60%
in approvals
9 citations
40%
in refusals
6 citations

This shows the decision reports in which 6 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why 6 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance

No Planning Inspectorate appeal decisions on record cite 6. When one lands (the appeals table refreshes each weekday), the dismissed/allowed record appears here — never estimated.

Related — follow the thread
Richmond Upon Thames
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Richmond Upon Thames's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Richmond Upon Thames decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.