Development Intent
AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesOfficersJane Woods Expired
Case officer · Richmond Upon Thames Planning

Jane Woods (Expired).

Last recorded decision Oct 2023 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Richmond Upon Thames with an approval rate of 84% across 100 decided planning applications, spanning 7 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer100 decisions84% approvalSave
Richmond Upon Thames · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
100
Applications
2022–23
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate84% · 23rd of 67
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Jane Woods (Expired)'s own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most across their decisions — how often each appears, and whether refusals citing it survive appeal.

In development — policy citations are coded from officer reports, and that parsing hasn't run for Richmond Upon Thames yet. Nothing is shown until it is real.

Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2022–23.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
23/1911/HOT
Householder Application
Approved
2023-10-30
23/2294/HOT
Householder Application
Approved
2023-10-27
23/1911/HOT
Householder Application
Approved
2023-10-30
23/2294/HOT
Householder Application
Approved
2023-10-27
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 100 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Thomas de Cruz Architects & Designers
2. Property Design and Draw Ltd
3. Neil Warner Architecture Ltd
4. SM Planning
At a glance
OfficerJane Woods (Expired)
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications100 (2022–23)
Approval rate84%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames planning register and published decision notices, 2022–23. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — Richmond Upon Thames's decision-notice parsing is limited coverage, so no borough or officer figure is shown.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.