Development Intent
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesTony Paterson
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Mortlake and Barnes Common, Richmond Upon Thames

Tony Paterson.

A Liberal Democrat member representing Mortlake and Barnes Common in Richmond Upon Thames.

Liberal DemocratMortlake and Barnes Common ward
Richmond Upon Thames · Tony Paterson's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
5
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Design
3
Conservation
2
Heritage
1
Character
1
Subscribe to see what Tony Paterson raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward support
4
Ward objection
1

How Tony Paterson acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Tony Paterson moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward support
Planning Committee
2023-07-19
Ward support
Planning Committee
2023-03-15
Ward support
Planning Committee
2023-03-15
Planning Committee
2024-01-31
Planning Committee
2023-03-15
Ward support
Planning Committee
2023-07-19
Ward support
Planning Committee
2023-03-15
Ward support
Planning Committee
2023-03-15
Show all 5 rows
Planning Committee
2024-01-31
Planning Committee
2023-03-15
At a glance
PartyLiberal Democrat
WardMortlake and Barnes Common
Planning committeeNo
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Richmond Upon Thames planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 4 of their 5 interventions (80%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.