Development Intent
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesJo Humphreys
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Whitton, Richmond Upon Thames

Jo Humphreys.

A Liberal Democrat member representing Whitton in Richmond Upon Thames.

Liberal DemocratWhitton ward
Richmond Upon Thames · Jo Humphreys's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
9
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Trees
8
Subscribe to see what Jo Humphreys raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward support
4
Ward objection
3
Declared interest
2

How Jo Humphreys acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Jo Humphreys moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward support
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Ward support
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Planning Committee
2019-07-10
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Ward support
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Ward support
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Show all 7 rows
Planning Committee
2019-07-10
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
Planning Committee
2021-09-29
At a glance
PartyLiberal Democrat
WardWhitton
Planning committeeNo
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Richmond Upon Thames planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 4 of their 9 interventions (44%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.