Development Intent
AtlasNewhamPolicySC5
Planning Atlas›Newham›SC5
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Newham · Local Plan · Policy

SC5 — Air Quality.

How Newham actually applies SC5: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

SC5 is a published Newham planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Newham Local Plan (adopted)

Newham · SC5
Where SC5 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~2
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
9
times cited
in parsed decision notices
60%
appeal survival
3 dismissed · 2 allowed at appeal
3 of 29
officer reach
10% of officers recorded in this period
Forest Gate South
top hotspot ward
2 citations
What this policy is about

Policy SC5 requires development to be at least Air Quality Neutral, supporting a net decrease in pollutants. It applies to all development in Newham, and the council will support proposals that meet its strategic principles, spatial strategy, and design and technical criteria.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Air Quality

Proposals that address the following strategic principles, spatial strategy and design and technical criteria will be supported: 1. Strategic Principles: a. All development should be at least Air Quality Neutral, supporting a net decrease in specified pollutants and making design, access, energy, and management decisions that minimise air pollution generation and exposure at demolition, construction, and operation stage; and b. Development will support implementation of Newham’s Air Quality Action Plan, ensuring identified actions and mitigation are incorporated where relevant. 2. Spatial Strategy: a. Development along major roads or in other locations that experience air quality exceedances1 should be configured to improve the dispersal of identified pollutants and reduce exposure without compromising SP7 objectives; and b. Development close to navigable waterways should maximise use of waterborne freight and waste movement during construction and operation. 3. Design and technical criteria: a. Air quality neutrality should be demonstrated using methodologies set out by the London Plan and related guidance; b. All Major development should detail how it aligns with the Mayor of London’s Control of Dust & Emissions during Construction & Demolition SPG2 or subsequent updates; c. Waste facilities and other dust and emissions-generating uses should be fully enclosed or provide an equivalent level of environmental protection with respect to air emissions; d. Developments should only deploy combustion-based energy sources (including CHP, biomass boilers, and wood-burning stoves) as a last resort; those that do should demonstrate use of low-emission plant and post process mitigation/treatment where necessary to avoid an increase in controlled pollutants; and e. Developments likely to generate any significant traffic, and hence air quality impacts, on the A12 and A406 (whether alone or in combination with other development) which pass within 200m of the Epping Forest SAC will need to undertake an assessment of impact on the SAC as part of the HRA. 1 DEFRA, UK and EU Air Quality Limits 2 GLA, Control of Dust & Emissions During Construction & Demolition SPG Newham Local Plan 2018 Sustainability For the purposes of Neighbourhood Planning, the following sections and associated subparagraphs of this policy are considered to be strategic policies with which a neighbourhood plan should conform: 1.

Verbatim from the adopted Newham plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
0% in approvals · 100% in refusals
9 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Forest Gate South2
Royal Docks1
Stratford And New Town1
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue SC5 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

SC5 appears most often in Forest Gate South, Royal Docks, Stratford And New Town. It appears across 3 of 29 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
0%
in approvals
0 citations
100%
in refusals
9 citations

This shows the decision reports in which SC5 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why SC5 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
60% survival
3 dismissed · 2 allowed — 5 PINS appeal decisions cite SC5

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite SC5. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing SC5 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Newham
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Newham's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Newham decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.