Development Intent
Planning AtlasNewhamH1
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Newham · Local Plan · Policy

H1 — Stepped housing target for strategic sites delivery.

How Newham actually applies H1: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

H1 is a published Newham planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Newham Local Plan (adopted)

Newham · H1
Where H1 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~26
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
365
times cited
in parsed decision notices
82%
appeal survival
86 dismissed · 19 allowed at appeal
18 of 29
officer reach
62% of officers recorded in this period
Forest Gate South
top hotspot ward
26 citations
What this policy is about

The policy sets a stepped housing target for 31 Strategic Sites, requiring 13,760 units in the short term (2018/19-2022/23), 19,760 units in the medium term (2023/24-2027/28), and 9,460 units in the long term (2028/29-2032/33). This applies to Strategic Sites and the council will resist development that does not meet these targets.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Stepped housing target for strategic sites delivery

The Plan sets a stepped housing target for the delivery of dwellings across 31 Strategic Sites, reflecting the longer timeframes typically required for development on these large, previously developed sites. The rates vary across short, medium, and long-term phases.

Verbatim from the adopted Newham plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
0% in approvals · 98% in refusals
365 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Forest Gate South26
Plaistow South25
Manor Park25
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue H1 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

H1 appears most often in Forest Gate South, Plaistow South, Manor Park. It appears across 18 of 29 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
0%
in approvals
1 citations
98%
in refusals
359 citations

This shows the decision reports in which H1 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 5 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why H1 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
82% survival
86 dismissed · 19 allowed105 PINS appeal decisions cite H1

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite H1. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing H1 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Newham
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Newham's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Newham decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.