Development Intent
AtlasNewhamCouncillorsPushpa_dipaklal_makwana
Planning AtlasNewhamPushpa Dipaklal Makwana
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Plashet, Newham

Pushpa Dipaklal Makwana.

A Labour member representing Plashet in Newham. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Plashet itself.

LabourPlashet ward
Newham · Pushpa Dipaklal Makwana's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
115
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Procedural
2
Subscribe to see what Pushpa Dipaklal Makwana raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Declared interest
34
Ward support
4

How Pushpa Dipaklal Makwana acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Pushpa Dipaklal Makwana moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward support
Local Development Committee
2021-05-12
Ward support
Local Development Committee
2021-05-12
Ward support
Local Development Committee
2021-05-12
Local Development Committee
2021-05-12
Ward support
Local Development Committee
2021-05-12
Ward support
Local Development Committee
2021-05-12
Ward support
Local Development Committee
2021-05-12
Show all 4 rows
Local Development Committee
2021-05-12
At a glance
PartyLabour
WardPlashet
Planning committeeNo
CouncilNewham
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Newham planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 5 of their 22 interventions (23%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.