Development Intent
AtlasMertonPolicyCS14
Planning AtlasMertonCS14
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Merton · Local Plan · Policy

CS14 — Design. Strategic.

How Merton actually applies CS14: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

CS14 is a published Merton planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Merton Local Plan (adopted)

Merton · CS14
Where CS14 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~18
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
334
times cited
in parsed decision notices
84%
appeal survival
42 dismissed · 8 allowed at appeal
16 of 16
officer reach
100% of officers recorded in this period
Colliers Wood
top hotspot ward
18 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue CS14 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

CS14 appears most often in Colliers Wood, Colliers Wood - historic, Graveney. It appears across 16 of 16 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
1%
in approvals
2 citations
99%
in refusals
332 citations

This shows the decision reports in which CS14 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why CS14 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
84% survival
42 dismissed · 8 allowed50 PINS appeal decisions cite CS14

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite CS14. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing CS14 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Merton
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Merton's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Merton decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.