Development Intent
Planning AtlasMertonVillageApplication
Planning Application

22/P3154

TROCHEE HOUSE, 66 Ridgway, Wimbledon, Merton, SW19 4RA

Full / Other PlanningVillage ward
Submission
24 Oct 2022
Target
15 Feb 2023
Decision
15 Feb 2023
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
15 Feb 2023
Decided by Stephen Hill under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

CONVERSION OF BUILDING FROM BEDSITS TO 2 X SELF-CONTAINED DWELLINGS INVOLVING PARTIAL DEMOLITION, EXTENSION AT REAR, NEW PART SIDE EXTENSION ON EAST SIDE TO CREATE SECONDARY ENTRANCE AND INSTALLATION OF NEW WINDOWS IN FLANK WALLS.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed development, due to the combination of the height, bulk, massing and design of the rear extensions would have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the existing Locally Listed Building, neighbouring buildings, and the immediate surrounding area. The impact on the existing building and its relationship with its neighbours would cause harm to the positive contribution the buildings make to the character and appearance of the Wimbledon West Conservation Area. This would be contrary to Policies DM D2, DM D3 and DM D4 of the Adopted Sites and Policies Plan and Policies Maps (July 2014), Policy CS14 of the Core Strategy (2011) and Policies HC1, D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021.

Reason 2

The proposed demolition of external fabric including the flank walls of the existing Locally Listed Building, which together with its neighbours has been assessed as making a positive contribution to the Wimbledon West Conservation Area, would have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the existing building, neighbouring buildings, and the Wimbledon West Conservation Area amounting to substantial harm. This would be contrary to Policies DM D2, DM D3 and DM D4 of the Adopted Sites and Policies Plan and Policies Maps (July 2014), Policy CS14 of the Core Strategy (2011) and Policies HC1, D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021. New Neighbour Notification Householder Prior Approval

Reason 3

The proposed development by reason of the position, scale, height and bulk of the rear extensions represents an unneighbourly form of development that would be unduly prominent, visually dominant and intrusive resulting in a sense of enclosure which would be materially harmful to the amenity of neighbouring occupiers, in particular those at 64 and 68 Ridgway. The development is therefore contrary to policy DM D2 of the Merton Sites and Policies Plan (2014) which seeks to protect the amenity of adjacent occupiers.

Policies cited
D4
CS14
HC1
D3
D2
Parties
Applicant
Bestcourt UK Ltd
Timeline
24 Oct 2022
Application submitted
15 Feb 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 17
Application Form Redacted.pdfView ↗
Decision Notice.pdfView ↗
CIL Form 01.pdfView ↗
Design and Access Statement.pdfView ↗
Arboricultural.pdfView ↗
Proposed Plans & Elevations.pdfView ↗
Existing Plans & Elevations.pdfView ↗
Press Notice.pdfView ↗
Demolition Plans & Elevations.pdfView ↗
Basement Impact Part B.pdfView ↗
Cover Letter.pdfView ↗
Site Location Plan.pdfView ↗
Basement Impact Part A.pdfView ↗
Delegated Report.pdfView ↗
Comments_The Wimbledon Society_09.12.2022.pdfView ↗
Basement Impact Part C.pdfView ↗
Application Statement.pdfView ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Merton planning register.
Summary
Reference
22/P3154
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Bestcourt UK Ltd
Submitted
24 Oct 2022
Decision date
15 Feb 2023
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
16
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 8 wks over the 8-week target