Development Intent
Planning AtlasLewishamGrove ParkApplication
Planning Application

DC/26/142895

LAND AT 41 KINGSAND ROAD & 246 BURNT ASH HILL, LONDON, SE12

Full / Other PlanningGrove Park wardPublic Transport Accessibility Level - 2: PTAL 2
Submission
3 Feb 2026
Target
10 Apr 2026
Decision
15 Apr 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
15 Apr 2026
Decided by Amanda Ghani under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Conversion of existing building at 41 Kingsand Road to provide an additional self-contained flat (Use Class C3), together with the construction of a single storey extension to the side to form new access, an external staircase at the rear, a roof terrace at 1st floor level and all associated works at 246 Burnt Ash Hill SE12. (Please note amended description).

Why it was refused
Reason 1

Insufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the loss of the storage facility would be acceptable or that its loss would not result in unacceptable harm to the viability and vitality of the Londis convienience store, contrary to Policy E9 of the London Plan (March 2021) and Policies EC8 of the Lewisham Local Plan (July 2025). 2. The proposed first-floor roof terrace would afford uninterrupted views into the rear window of the property at No. 242 Burnt Ash Hill and the small courtyard area in front resulting in a significant degree of privacy loss to this adjacent neighbour. The roof terrace would also result in increased, elevated noise levels at the rear of the subject terrace which is likely to cause disturbance and detrimentally impact upon neighbouring properties, contrary to Paragraph 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies HO2, QD7, & QD8 of the Lewisham Local Plan (2025) and the Council's Alterations and Extensions SPD (November 2019). 3. The proposed development, by reason of the failure to provide an appropriate quantum of safe, secure, accessible and convenient cycle parking and refuse facilities, the loss of existing refuse facilities and the overprovision of off street car parking spaces fails to promote active travel and sustainable transport modes, leading to unacceptable harm to the objectives of reducing car dependency and the associated health impacts, contrary to Section 9 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy T5 and Table 10.2 of the London Plan (2021), and Policies TR1 and TR4 of the Lewisham Local Plan (2025). 4. The proposed dwelling, due to a lack of privacy for the bedroom and lounge; poor outlook from the lounge, poor ventilation and a lack of evidence to demonstrate that the lounge would receive adequate levels of daylight would fail to provide an acceptable standard of living conditions for future residents of the new development contrary to paragraph 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policy QD8 of the Lewisham Local Plan (2025). 5. The proposed roof terrace by reason of its scale and siting will result in a visually intrusive and incongruous addition to the street scene which fails to respond positively to the character of the area which would fail to achieve the high-quality design required by Paragraphs 11 and 131 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 of the London Plan (March 2021) and Policies QD1 and QD6 of the Lewisham Local Plan (2025).

Policies cited
E9
EC8
National Planning Policy Framework 135
QD8
National Planning Policy Framework 9
London Plan 10.2
TR1
TR4
D6
National Planning Policy Framework 11
National Planning Policy Framework 131
D3
QD1
QD6
NPPF
Parties
Applicant
Mr Pankaj Patel
Timeline
3 Feb 2026
Application submitted
13 Feb 2026
Application validated
15 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 7
Delegated report15 Apr 2026View ↗
Decision notice15 Apr 2026View ↗
Air quality neutral statement13 Feb 2026View ↗
A.014 Feb 2026View ↗
A.02 - a.064 Feb 2026View ↗
Planning statement4 Feb 2026View ↗
Redacted4 Feb 2026View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Lewisham planning register.
Summary
Reference
DC/26/142895
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Mr Pankaj Patel
Submitted
3 Feb 2026
Decision date
15 Apr 2026
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
10
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 2 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0