Development Intent
Planning AtlasLewishamForest HillApplication
Planning Application

DC/20/117044

33A RINGMORE RISE, LONDON, SE23 3DF

HouseholderForest Hill wardPublic Transport Accessibility Level - 1a: PTAL 1a
Submission
11 Jun 2020
Target
6 Aug 2020
Decision
6 Aug 2020
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
6 Aug 2020
Decided by Joshua Knowles under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

The construction of a part 2, part 3 storey side extension at 33A Ringmore Rise, SE23, together with the construction of a pitched roof with a rear dormer, and associated alterations to the front, side,and rear elevations.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed extension by virtue of its siting, bulk and massing would have an unacceptable impact on the residential amenity of No. 3 Liphook Crescent due to an increase to the sense of enclosure, overlooking caused by the proposed rear dormer and a reduced outlook, contrary to Policy 15 High quality design for Lewisham of the Core Strategy (June 2011), Policy DM 31 Alterations and extensions to existing buildings including residential extensions of the Development Management Local Plan (November 2014), and the Alterations and Extensions Supplementary Planning Document (2019).

Reason 2

The proposed extension due to its overbearing massing and siting would fail to respect the scale and form of the host dwellinghouse, adjoining dwellinghouse and would harm the character of the immediate surrounding streetscape in this prominent location, contrary to Paragraph 127 and 130 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2019); Policy 15 'High Quality Design for Lewisham' of the adopted Core Strategy (2011); DM Policy 30 'Urban Design and Local Character' of the adopted Development Management Local Plan (November 2014), Policy DM 31 Alterations and extensions to existing buildings including residential extensions of the Development Management Local Plan (November 2014), and the Alterations and Extensions Supplementary Planning Document (2019).

Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 127
National Planning Policy Framework 130
NPPF
Parties
Applicant
Mr & Mrs Paolo & Saartaz Ulivi & Mokaddaam
Timeline
11 Jun 2020
Application submitted
6 Aug 2020
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 12
Appeal decision1 Mar 2021View ↗
Appeal documents 121 Jan 2021View ↗
Appeal start letter20 Jan 2021View ↗
Appeal form20 Jan 2021View ↗
Appeal documents20 Jan 2021View ↗
Decision notice6 Aug 2020View ↗
Redacted11 Jun 2020View ↗
Design & access statement11 Jun 2020View ↗
33a rr pl 0011 Jun 2020View ↗
Proposed plans11 Jun 2020View ↗
Existing plans11 Jun 2020View ↗
33a rr s 0011 Jun 2020View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Lewisham planning register.
Summary
Reference
DC/20/117044
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Mr & Mrs Paolo & Saartaz Ulivi & Mokaddaam
Submitted
11 Jun 2020
Decision date
6 Aug 2020
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
8
wks · this application
Submission → decision
Public response
Objections
1
In support
1
Total comments
2