Development Intent
Planning AtlasLambethT3
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Lambeth · Local Plan · Policy

T3 — Cycling.

How Lambeth actually applies T3: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

T3 is a published Lambeth planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Lambeth Local Plan (adopted)

Lambeth · T3
Where T3 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~40
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
514
times cited
in parsed decision notices
83%
appeal survival
38 dismissed · 8 allowed at appeal
55 of 70
officer reach
79% of officers recorded in this period
Clapham Town
top hotspot ward
40 citations
What this policy is about

Policy T3: Cycling in Lambeth requires the provision of secure and covered cycle parking facilities, with at least 25% of spaces being accessible type. Developers must also provide charge points for electric cycles and contribute to improvements in cycle access and road safety. This includes contributing land and/or finance for new cycle hire docking locations and other public facilities.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Cycling

A. The council will apply London Plan policy T5 in accordance with the Lambeth Healthy Routes Plan to promote cycling. B. Local Plan policy Q13 sets out the council’s quality requirements in relation to the provision of cycle parking. Lambeth’s Healthy Routes Plan sets out the quality requirements in terms of cycling infrastructure. C. Lambeth will improve conditions for people to cycle and make cycling a safer, healthier, quicker, more direct and attractive form of travel. Lambeth will help to enable people who want to cycle to do so and seek to address concerns around road danger and air quality. D. In line with the hierarchy set out in Local Plan policy T1(c), Lambeth will promote cycling by reducing motor traffic and through improvements to  To table of contents Lambeth Local Plan 2020–2035 | Section 8: Transport and communications routes, giving greater priority to cyclists in the use of road space, reducing road danger from other transport modes and through improvements to signage and facilities. E. The council will require the provision of appropriate secure and covered cycle parking facilities in accordance with the minimum standards set out in London Plan policy T5 and with Local Plan policy Q13. When designing building layouts sufficient space should be allocated at the outset to meet these requirements. Development proposals for non-residential uses should include provision of showers, changing facilities, drying rooms and lockers for cyclists appropriate to the number of cycle parking spaces provided. In purpose-built student accommodation schemes, part of the required cycle parking provision could be provided as pool bikes. For other types of development, pool bike provision is encouraged in addition to the cycle parking requirement. F. In all developments at least 25 per cent of the total cycle parking provision should be of the most accessible type, such as ‘Sheffield’ stands, of which five per cent of the total cycle parking provision should be designed and clearly designated for larger and adapted cycles. These stands should be spaced further apart and close to access points, to cater for users with disabilities and cargo bikes. For a development requiring 100 cycle parking spaces, this would equate to 20 spaces with standard Sheffield type stands and a further 5 in stands spaced further apart and close to access points. In all cases at least one Sheffield stand should be provided, close to the access point. The provision of folding bikes with storage will be considered where a high level of cycle-rail trips is expected. G. In all developments at least one charge point should be provided to allow for re-charging of electric cycles and a charge point should be provided for a minimum of 1 in 10 cycle parking spaces. Charge points should be accessible to all cycle stand types, particularly those intended to accommodate larger/cargo cycles which may be more likely to require electric assistance. H. Development proposals will be expected to enable and contribute towards improvements to cycle access, including the delivery and improvement of local and strategic routes and links, as identified in the Lambeth Healthy Routes Plan. All development should reduce road danger, to help deliver ‘Vision Zero’ in the borough. In appropriate locations, developers will be required to contribute land and/or finance towards the delivery of new cycle hire docking locations and other public facilities ancillary to cycling, such as cycle pumps/servicing facilities. A minimum of three years free membership of the Cycle Hire scheme for all residents regardless of tenure, should be made available in new residential developments. Uptake of cycle hire business accounts should be encouraged for occupiers of commercial developments through the travel plan process.

Verbatim from the adopted Lambeth plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
58% in approvals · 41% in refusals
514 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Clapham Town40
Streatham St Leonard's39
Knights Hill29
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue T3 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

T3 appears most often in Clapham Town, Streatham St Leonard's, Knights Hill. It appears across 55 of 70 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
58%
in approvals
298 citations
41%
in refusals
212 citations

This shows the decision reports in which T3 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 4 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why T3 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
83% survival
38 dismissed · 8 allowed46 PINS appeal decisions cite T3

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite T3. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing T3 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Lambeth
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Lambeth's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Lambeth decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.