Q10 — Trees.
How Lambeth actually applies Q10: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.
Q10 is a published Lambeth planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.
Cited under: Lambeth Local Plan (adopted)
Policy Q10: Protects existing trees on development sites, especially those of significant amenity, historic or ecological value. New developments must retain and protect these trees, and may be required to plant additional trees. The council will make tree preservation orders and use planning conditions to protect trees.
Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.
Trees
Verbatim from the adopted Lambeth plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.
306 citations in the selected period
Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue Q10 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.
Q10 appears most often in Clapham Town, Streatham St Leonard's, Brixton North. It appears across 50 of 70 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.
This shows the decision reports in which Q10 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 3 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.
Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why Q10 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.
From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite Q10. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing Q10 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.
Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.