Development Intent
AtlasLambethPolicyQ10
Planning AtlasLambethQ10
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Lambeth · Local Plan · Policy

Q10 — Trees.

How Lambeth actually applies Q10: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

Q10 is a published Lambeth planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Lambeth Local Plan (adopted)

Lambeth · Q10
Where Q10 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~43
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
306
times cited
in parsed decision notices
81%
appeal survival
13 dismissed · 3 allowed at appeal
50 of 70
officer reach
71% of officers recorded in this period
Clapham Town
top hotspot ward
43 citations
What this policy is about

Policy Q10: Protects existing trees on development sites, especially those of significant amenity, historic or ecological value. New developments must retain and protect these trees, and may be required to plant additional trees. The council will make tree preservation orders and use planning conditions to protect trees.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Trees

A. Proposals for new development will be required to take particular account of existing trees on the site and on adjoining land. B. Development will not be permitted that would result in the loss of trees of significant amenity, historic or ecological/habitat conservation value (including veteran trees), or give rise to a threat, immediate or long term, to the continued wellbeing of such trees. C. Where trees are located within a development site, the proposal will be supported only where it has been demonstrated that: i. trees of significant amenity, historic or ecological/habitat conservation value have been retained as part of the site layout; ii. the retained trees can be satisfactorily protected from construction impacts and site works during the development stage; and iii. the retained trees have been positively integrated, on a sustainable basis, as part of the site layout. D. The council will continue to protect trees in new development by making tree preservation orders and/or by the use of appropriate planning conditions. E. The council will continue to protect trees, by the use of tree preservation orders, that contribute to the amenity of an area or that are under threat from inappropriate pruning works or removal.  To table of contents Lambeth Local Plan 2020–2035 | Section 10: Quality of the Built Environment F. Wherever appropriate, the planting of additional trees should be included in new developments in a coordinated way to maximise the green infrastructure network. G. Where it is imperative to remove trees, adequate replacement planting will be secured. The amount and nature of the replacement planting will be based on the existing value of the benefits of the trees removed, calculated using cost/benefit tools such as i-tree or CAVAT as set out in London Plan policy G7 C.

Verbatim from the adopted Lambeth plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
81% in approvals · 18% in refusals
306 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Clapham Town43
Streatham St Leonard's14
Brixton North13
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue Q10 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

Q10 appears most often in Clapham Town, Streatham St Leonard's, Brixton North. It appears across 50 of 70 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
81%
in approvals
248 citations
18%
in refusals
55 citations

This shows the decision reports in which Q10 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 3 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why Q10 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
81% survival
13 dismissed · 3 allowed16 PINS appeal decisions cite Q10

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite Q10. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing Q10 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Lambeth
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Lambeth's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Lambeth decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.