Development Intent
Planning AtlasLambethKnights HillApplication
Planning Application

25/03217/FUL

311 Leigham Court Road London Lambeth SW16 2RX

Full / Other PlanningKnights Hill wardNeighbourhood Planning Areas: Norwood Planning Assembly
Submission
13 Oct 2025
Target
8 Dec 2025
Decision
8 Dec 2025
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
8 Dec 2025
Decided by Nadia Harper under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Erection of a single storey outbuilding in the rear garden. (Re consultation due to revised plans being received)

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed outbuilding, by virtue of its full-width footprint, siting directly on the shared boundaries with neighbouring properties, and its design and overall scale and height of 3.9 metres, would result in an overly dominant and incongruous addition to the rear garden. The lack of a minimum 1-metre clearance around the structure exacerbates its visual bulk and restricts access for maintenance. Consequently, the development would appear visually intrusive and harmful to the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies Q2, Q5 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and the Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ Supplementary Planning Document Lambeth Design Guide (2023) and fails to accord with paragraph 208 of the NPPF (2023).

Reason 2

The proposed outbuilding, by reason of its height, scale and proximity to the boundary, would result in an undue sense of enclosure and a perceptible reduction in outlook from the ground floor side-facing window of No. 11 St Julians Close. This impact would cause harm to the residential amenity of the occupiers of that property; The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).

Reason 3

Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed development has taken particular account of existing trees on site would not result in the loss of trees of significant amenity, historic or ecological/habitat conservation value (including veteran trees), or give rise to a threat, immediate or long term, to the continued wellbeing of such trees contrary to policy Q10 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021)

Policies cited
Q2
Q5
Q11
NPPF
Q10
Parties
Applicant
Mr. Frank Otuo
Appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Allowed
Timeline
13 Oct 2025
Application submitted
8 Dec 2025
Delegated decision: Refused
Appeal: Appeal decided
Supporting documents · 15
Appeal Decision - redacted19 Mar 2026View ↗
APPEAL QUESTIONNAIRE19 Jan 2026View ↗
APPEAL 6002734 REDACTED13 Jan 2026View ↗
Decision Notice8 Dec 2025View ↗
Delegated Register8 Dec 2025View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANS4 Nov 2025View ↗
EXISTING PHOTOGRAPHS13 Oct 2025View ↗
OS MAP13 Oct 2025View ↗
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN, PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR, FIRST FLOOR AND 13 Oct 2025View ↗
FIRE STATEMENT13 Oct 2025View ↗
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA13 Oct 2025View ↗
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT13 Oct 2025View ↗
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM13 Oct 2025View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED BLOCK PLANS13 Oct 2025View ↗
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT13 Oct 2025View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Lambeth planning register.
Summary
Reference
25/03217/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Mr. Frank Otuo
Submitted
13 Oct 2025
Decision date
8 Dec 2025
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
8
wks · this application
Submission → decision
Public response
Objections
2
In support
4
Total comments
6