Development Intent
Planning AtlasLambethBrixton Rush CommonApplication
Planning Application

24/00945/FUL

24 - 28 Brixton Water Lane London SW2 1PE

Full / Other PlanningBrixton Rush Common wardLocal Centre: Tulse Hill/Brixton Water Lane Local Centre
Submission
21 Mar 2024
Target
6 Jun 2024
Decision
5 Jun 2024
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
5 Jun 2024
Decided by Felicia Onabanjo under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Erection of a mansard roof extension to provide 2 self-contained flats, together with the provision of cycle storage at ground floor level.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed used of commercial floorspace at ground floor level of the application property to make provision for cycle storage associated with the proposed residential units would unacceptably reduce the internal floorspace of the existing commercial units at No. 24 and 28 Brixton Water Lane. The proposal would significantly reduce the capacity of the existing commercial units to provide cycle storage for staff and to accommodate refuse Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 80771 www.lambeth.gov.uk London planning@lambeth.gov.uk SW2 9QQ REFULZ and recycling of commercial waste. In these respects, the proposal would compromise the viability of the existing commercial units and consequently the vitality of the Tulse Hill/Brixton Water Lane Local Centre. As such the proposal is contrary to Policies ED7 and ED10 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).

Reason 2

The proposed 1-bedroom residential units would intensify the non-family size dwellings on the site thereby failing to offer a range of housing types on the site including family sized accommodation to meet the current and future housing needs of the borough contrary to Policy H4 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).

Reason 3

The proposed flats by reason of their size, would fail to provide the required minimum internal floorspace space of 50sqm for 1-bedroom and 2 persons flatted developments. The inadequate standard of accommodation is demonstrated by the insufficient in-built storage space and the lack of any outdoor private amenity space or equivalent internal floorspace for each flat. As such, the development would provide substandard quality of accommodation contrary to Policy H5 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021).

Reason 4

The proposed mansard roof extension by reason of its design, scale and massing would result in an incongruous and over dominant addition that would fail to appear subordinate the host building and would harm the uniformity and architectural integrity of the adjoining group of buildings of which it forms a part. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to Policies Q2, Q5, Q8 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021), and design guidance on mansard roof extensions contained in the Lambeth Design Guide (2023).

Reason 5

In the absence of detailed plans for the provision for cycle parking, it has not been demonstrated that the development has sufficient space for the requisite number of long and short stay cycle spaces for the future occupants of the flats and visitors. In this respect, the proposal is contrary to Policies Q13 and T3 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and Policy T5 of the London Plan (2021).

Reason 6

In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or other legal agreement securing appropriate mitigation by restricting future occupiers of the development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone, providing car club membership and cycle hire scheme, the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing parking stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies D4, T1 and T7 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and Policy T6 of the London Plan (2021).

Policies cited
ED7
ED10
H4
H5
D6
Q2
Q5
Q8
Q11
Q13
T3
T5
D4
T1
T7
T6
Parties
Applicant
Mr. F and K Zia
Timeline
21 Mar 2024
Application submitted
11 Apr 2024
Application validated
5 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 28
125 of 28
Decision Notice5 Jun 2024View ↗
OFFICER REPORT4 Jun 2024View ↗
EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN18 Apr 2024View ↗
EXISTING SECTION BB AND CC18 Apr 2024View ↗
EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION18 Apr 2024View ↗
EXISTING REAR ELEVATION18 Apr 2024View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN18 Apr 2024View ↗
EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN18 Apr 2024View ↗
PROPOSED SECTION CC18 Apr 2024View ↗
EXISTING ROOF PLAN18 Apr 2024View ↗
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION18 Apr 2024View ↗
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION18 Apr 2024View ↗
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN18 Apr 2024View ↗
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN18 Apr 2024View ↗
PROPOSED SECTION BB18 Apr 2024View ↗
ISSUE SHEET18 Apr 2024View ↗
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN18 Apr 2024View ↗
PROPOSED SECTION A-A18 Apr 2024View ↗
OS Map18 Apr 2024View ↗
EXISTING SECTION AA18 Apr 2024View ↗
PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR PLAN18 Apr 2024View ↗
DRAWING ISSUE SHEET21 Mar 2024View ↗
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT21 Mar 2024View ↗
PLANNING STATEMENT21 Mar 2024View ↗
PREVIOUS DELEGATED REPORT21 Mar 2024View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Lambeth planning register.
Summary
Reference
24/00945/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Mr. F and K Zia
Submitted
21 Mar 2024
Decision date
5 Jun 2024
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
11
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 3 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0