Development Intent
Planning AtlasLambethBrixton Rush CommonApplication
Planning Application

23/00492/FUL

64 Tulse Hill London Lambeth SW2 2PT

Full / Other PlanningBrixton Rush Common wardNeighbourhood Planning Areas: Tulse Hill Neighbourhood Forum
Submission
15 Feb 2023
Target
14 Sep 2023
Decision
21 Nov 2023
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
21 Nov 2023
Decided by George Hodgkinson under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Conversion of a single dwelling into three flats (1x3 bedrooms, 1X2 bedrooms and 1x1 bedrooms) including the erection of a single storey rear extension, a hip to gable roof extension, erection of rear dormer, installation of 3 rooflights to the front and fenestration alterations including opening up of windows in flanking elevation.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed second floor unit, Flat 03, fails to provide an acceptable level of external amenity space for future occupants and the proposed gross internal area of the units is not sufficient in being able to provide additional internal living space equivalent to the shortfall of external amenity space and therefore provides a substandard level of accommodation. This is contrary to Policy H5 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021). Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171 Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk REFULZ

Reason 2

In the absence of any existing and proposed section drawings, it has not been demonstrated that a minimum ceiling height of 2.5m for at least 75% of the gross internal area of the proposed development is attainable. This is contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021).

Reason 3

Insufficient details have been provided of any potential screening or safety measures to the first-floor roof to enable officers to undertake a full assessment on the suitability of the design, materials, bulk, massing and impact on visual amenity of such measures contrary to policies Q2, Q8 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).

Reason 4

The proposed rear dormer by way of the cut-out to form the terrace is considered to introduce an incongruous built form to the rear roof slope of the property which would be highly visible from Athlone Road and fails to respect the architectural integrity of the host building and established character of the terrace and area. As such, it is considered to be contrary to policies Q2, Q5, Q8 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and the Lambeth Design Guide SPD (2023).

Reason 5

The proposed central terraced area set within the proposed rear dormer, would unacceptably impact the privacy of the users of the rear garden at Flat 01, 64 Tulse Hill and the rear garden of 66 Tulse Hill by reason of overlooking and perceived overlooking. contrary to Policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021).

Reason 6

The proposed door at first floor on the rear elevation forms an incongruous addition that fails to respond positively to the original architecture and fenestration of the host building or the character and appearance of the terrace and wider area, contrary to policies Q2, Q5, Q8 and Q11 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and the Lambeth Design Guide SPD (2023).

Reason 7

In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or other legal agreement securing appropriate mitigation by restricting future occupiers of the development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone, providing car club membership and cycle hire scheme, the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing parking stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The application is therefore contrary to Policies D4 and T1 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2021) and Policy T6 of the London Plan (2021).

Policies cited
H5
D6
Q2
Q8
Q11
Q5
D4
T1
T6
Parties
Timeline
15 Feb 2023
Application submitted
4 May 2023
Application validated
21 Nov 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 47
125 of 47
Delegated Register21 Nov 2023View ↗
Decision Notice21 Nov 2023View ↗
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN9 Nov 2023View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN9 Nov 2023View ↗
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS9 Nov 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN9 Nov 2023View ↗
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN9 Nov 2023View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLANS6 Oct 2023View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN27 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN27 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN27 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN11 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN4 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN4 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLANS4 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS4 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FRONT GARDEN PLAN4 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN4 Sep 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN22 Aug 2023View ↗
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING22 Aug 2023View ↗
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN22 Aug 2023View ↗
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS22 Aug 2023View ↗
PROPOSED LOWER GROUND FLOOR22 Aug 2023View ↗
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN18 Jul 2023View ↗
PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN11 Jul 2023View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Lambeth planning register.
Summary
Reference
23/00492/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Mr H Thomas
Submitted
15 Feb 2023
Decision date
21 Nov 2023
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
40
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 32 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2