Development Intent
Planning AtlasLambethStreatham St LeonardsApplication
Planning Application

22/03355/FUL

163 Gleneldon Mews London Lambeth SW16 2AZ

Full / Other PlanningStreatham St Leonards wardConservation Area: CA54 : Streatham High Rd Streatham Hill C
Submission
20 Sep 2022
Target
16 Jan 2023
Decision
16 Jan 2023
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
16 Jan 2023
Decided by Michael Clawson under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Erection of mansard roof extension at first floor level to provide a residential unit (Class C3). Retention of existing uses at ground floor level.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed mansard roof extension by reason of its siting, scale, bulk, detailed design and use of unsympathetic materials would result in an incongruous and obtrusive form of development. Consequently, the proposal would be harmful to the established character and appearance of the host building and wider Streatham High Road Conservation Area, contrary to policies Q5, Q11, and Q22 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021). Lambeth Planning Telephone 020 7926 1180 PO Box 734 Facsimile 020 7926 1171 Winchester www.lambeth.gov.uk SO23 5DG planning@lambeth.gov.uk REFULZ

Reason 2

The proposal would fail to meet the Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) requirements in terms of its GIA, private amenity space and in-built storage. The proposal would therefore provide a sub-standard level of accommodation and a poor living environment for future occupants. The application is therefore contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies H5 and Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).

Reason 3

The proposed access steps and door on the first-floor rear elevation of the proposal would result in a loss of privacy to the occupiers of the adjoining property (No.163 Streatham High Road) and the amenity space to the rear of the host building. The proposed development is therefore unacceptable in amenity terms and therefore fails to comply with policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).

Reason 4

The proposed development has not met the minimum requirement of 2 long-stay cycle parking spaces for the residential unit, nor has any cycle parking details been provided outlining the location of any existing spaces. As such, the proposal would fail to promote and ensure sustainable travel in line with the borough's aims, and therefore would fail to comply with policy Q13 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).

Reason 5

In the absence of a Section 106 Agreement to secure a contribution to any future CPZ (Controlled Parking Zone), provision of a car club membership and cycle hire membership the transport impacts of the development would not be fully addressed, and it would fail to promote less private car ownership and sustainable travel. The application is therefore contrary to policies T1, T3 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 (2021).

Policies cited
Q22
D6
H5
Q2
Q13
T1
T3
T6
Parties
Applicant
Mr Abdul Lemboye
Timeline
20 Sep 2022
Application submitted
14 Oct 2022
Application validated
16 Jan 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 15
Decision Notice16 Jan 2023View ↗
Delegated Register12 Jan 2023View ↗
HERITAGE STATEMENT28 Oct 2022View ↗
BLOCK PLAN OF THE SITE20 Sep 2022View ↗
3D PROJECTION - EXISTING PROPOSED20 Sep 2022View ↗
EXISTING PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION20 Sep 2022View ↗
EXISTING PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION PLANS20 Sep 2022View ↗
THE LOCATION PLAN20 Sep 2022View ↗
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA20 Sep 2022View ↗
EXISTING PROPOSED LOFT FLOOR20 Sep 2022View ↗
EXISTING PROPOSED ROOF PLAN20 Sep 2022View ↗
EXISTING PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PLAN20 Sep 2022View ↗
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM20 Sep 2022View ↗
EXISTING PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLANS20 Sep 2022View ↗
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT20 Sep 2022View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Lambeth planning register.
Summary
Reference
22/03355/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Mr Abdul Lemboye
Submitted
20 Sep 2022
Decision date
16 Jan 2023
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
17
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 9 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0