Development Intent
Planning AtlasLambethWaterloo & South BankApplication
Planning Application

22/01698/FUL

Arches 187 And 191�Carlisle Lane London SE1 7LH

Full / Other PlanningWaterloo & South Bank wardEnvironment Agency Flood Zone: Environment Agency Flood Zone
Submission
11 May 2022
Target
11 Oct 2022
Decision
11 Oct 2022
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
11 Oct 2022
Decided by Michael Clawson under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Retrospective application for the use of Arches 187 and 191 as commercial kitchens together with associated external alterations and plants, including 1 extract duct, 1 air intake louvre to Arch 187 and 2 extract ducts and 2 air intake louvres to Arch 191.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The use by virtue of its nature, intensity and activity, in particular the volume and frequency of deliveries, traffic generation and impact on traffic flow and road safety, causes harm to the amenity of the area in terms of noise and disturbance, contributes towards opportunities to engage in anti-social behaviour to the detriment of community safety and results in unacceptable pedestrian and highway safety impacts contrary to policies Q2 (Amenity), Q3 (Safety, crime prevention and counter terrorism), T2 (Walking), T3 (Cycling), T6 (Parking) and T7 (Servicing), ED6 (Railway arches) and ED8 (Evening economy and food and drink uses) of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035, and Policy (T4 Assessing and mitigating transport impacts) of the London Plan 2021.

Reason 2

The submission has failed to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority that the development would provide a satisfactory provision of residual and recyclable waste storage in the interest of amenity and would harm the setting of the character and appearance of the adjoining conservation area. The submission is contrary to policy Q12 (Refuse and recycling) and Q22 (Conservation Areas) of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035 and the council's Refuse and Recycling Storage Design Guide and Waste and Recycling Storage and Collection Requirements - Technical Specifications for Architects and Developers.

Reason 3

The submission has failed to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority that the development would provide satisfactory cycle storage in the interest of sustainable transport, health and wellbeing. The submission is contrary to policy T3 (Cycling) and Q13 (Cycle storage) of the Lambeth Local Plan 2020-2035.

Parties
Applicant
191 Carlisle Lane Lon Ltd
Timeline
11 May 2022
Application submitted
7 Jun 2022
Application validated
11 Oct 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 19
Delegated Register11 Oct 2022View ↗
Decision Notice11 Oct 2022View ↗
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA14 Jun 2022View ↗
EXISTING GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR PLANS 1878 Jun 2022View ↗
PLANNING STATEMENT (WITH HERITAGE STATEMENT)8 Jun 2022View ↗
PRE-EXISTING GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR PLANS 1878 Jun 2022View ↗
EXISTING GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR PLANS 1918 Jun 2022View ↗
PRE-EXISTING GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR PLANS 1918 Jun 2022View ↗
EXISTING ELEVATIONS 1878 Jun 2022View ↗
EXISTING ELEVATION 1918 Jun 2022View ↗
PRE-EXISTING ELEVATIONS 1878 Jun 2022View ↗
PRE-EXISTING ELEVATION 1918 Jun 2022View ↗
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT8 Jun 2022View ↗
LOCATION PLAN8 Jun 2022View ↗
OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN11 May 2022View ↗
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM11 May 2022View ↗
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT11 May 2022View ↗
ODOUR APPRAISAL11 May 2022View ↗
TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT11 May 2022View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Lambeth planning register.
Summary
Reference
22/01698/FUL
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
191 Carlisle Lane Lon Ltd
Submitted
11 May 2022
Decision date
11 Oct 2022
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
22
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 14 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
8
In support
2
Total comments
10