Development Intent
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesSabah Hamed
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Kingston Gate, Kingston Upon Thames

Sabah Hamed.

A Liberal Democrat member representing Kingston Gate in Kingston Upon Thames. 17% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Kingston Gate itself.

Liberal DemocratKingston Gate ward
Kingston Upon Thames · Sabah Hamed's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
12
Interventions
at committee
4
Meetings
attended
17%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Procedural
1
Noise
1
Subscribe to see what Sabah Hamed raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Objected
2
Voted for
1
Moved approval
1
Requested condition
1

How Sabah Hamed acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Sabah Hamed moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Voted for
Planning Committee
2022-05-26
Objected
Planning Committee
2022-06-22
Moved approval
Planning Committee
2022-05-26
Planning Committee
2022-09-07
Planning Committee
2022-09-07
Voted for
Planning Committee
2022-05-26
Objected
Planning Committee
2022-06-22
Moved approval
Planning Committee
2022-05-26
Show all 5 rows
Planning Committee
2022-09-07
Planning Committee
2022-09-07
At a glance
PartyLiberal Democrat
WardKingston Gate
Planning committeeNo
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Kingston Upon Thames planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 12 of their 12 interventions (100%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.