Development Intent
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesTolworthApplication
Planning Application

25/00141/FUL

326 Hook Rise North Tolworth KT6 7LN

Full / Other PlanningTolworth ward
Submission
Target
Decision
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
Decided by Gosia Danik under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Erection of roof extension with rear dormer to create a self-contained 2-bedroom, 3-person flat, access with a new external staircase at the rear of the property.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

It has not been demonstrated that the provision of the external staircase would not adversely affect the existing kitchen windows and therefore the amenities of the adjoining occupiers at the flats below at 326 Hook Rise North in terms of unacceptable loss of outlook, privacy, daylight and undue overlooking. Furthermore, it has not been demonstrated that the proposed staircase would not adversely affect the amenities of potential future occupiers of 322-324 Hook Rise North in terms of undue overlooking, loss of privacy and disturbance. Therefore, the proposal is considered to be contrary to Paragraph 135 of the NPPF 2024, Policies D3 of the London Plan 2021 and DM10 of the Council's Core Strategy 2012.

Reason 2

The proposed development would result in a poor standard of residential accommodation, as evidenced by the failure to demonstrate adequate access to the proposed unit and usability of the proposed waste and recycling storage. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan 2021 and policies DM10 and DM13 of the Council's Core Strategy 2012.

Reason 3

It has not been demonstrated that integrated, well-designed, accessible and convenient recycling facilities and cycle storage could be provided for the proposed unit and could be accommodated with the suggested location, contrary to Policy T5 of the London Plan 2021 and policies CS9 and DM10 of the Council's Core Strategy 2012.

Reason 4

In the absence of a legal agreement to ensure that future occupants of the proposed development would be precluded from obtaining on-street car parking permits, the proposed development would lead to inconsiderate parking and increase on-street car parking pressure and congestion in surrounding streets. As such, the proposal is considered to conflict with Policy T6 of the London Plan 2021 and Policies DM9 and DM10 of the Council's adopted LDF Core Strategy 2012.

Policies cited
D3
DM10
NPPF
D6
DM13
T5
CS9
T6
DM9
Parties
Applicant
Mr George Holland
Timeline
Application submitted
Supporting documents · 25
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL28 Mar 2025View ↗
Application Form (No Personal Details)31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0510 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0413 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0412 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0411 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0410 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0314 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0313 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0312 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0311 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 0310 REV A31 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 020122 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 030122 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 030022 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 030322 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 030222 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 40022 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 040122 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 040322 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 050022 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 051122 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 040222 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 020022 Jan 2025View ↗
326 HR 051222 Jan 2025View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register.
Summary
Reference
25/00141/FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Mr George Holland
Submitted
Decision date
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)