Development Intent
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesAlexandraApplication
Planning Application

24/00155/FUL

113 Tolworth Rise North And Partial Land To Rear Of No.s 107, 109 And 111 Tolworth Surbiton KT5 9EP

Full / Other PlanningAlexandra wardKey Area of Change: Name: Tolworth Key Area of Change
Submission
17 Jan 2024
Target
10 Apr 2024
Decision
16 Apr 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
16 Apr 2026
Decided by Joel Turner under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Partial demolition and alterations to no. 113 Tolworth Rise North, demolition of garage and shed to allow for new road to provide access to 4no. 3 bed, 4 person detached houses with associated works.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

Character and appearance The proposed development, by reason of its quantum, siting, layout and suburban form within a backland garden location, would introduce an unduly cramped, dominant and incongruous form of development that would fail to respect the established pattern, grain and spacious character of the area. The proposal would erode the contribution made by the existing open rear garden land to the prevailing character of the locality and would not respond positively to local context. The development would therefore cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area, contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021, Policy DM10 of the Council's adopted Core Strategy 2012, and the design objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework (December 2024).

Reason 2

Highway safety and access The proposed development has failed to demonstrate that it would provide a safe, suitable and policy- compliant means of access for all users. By reason of the constrained and inadequate width of the access, the absence of satisfactory pedestrian segregation, restricted visibility, and the lack of a Stage 1 Road Safety Audit and sufficient detailed access drawings, the Local Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that vehicles, including larger service and emergency vehicles, could safely and conveniently enter, leave and manoeuvre within the site, or that pedestrians could safely access the development. The proposal would therefore give rise to unacceptable highway safety concerns and is contrary to Policies T4 and T6 of the London Plan 2021, Policies DM9 and DM10 of the Council's Core Strategy 2012, and the transport and safety objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework (December 2024).

Policies cited
D3
DM10
NPPF
T4
T6
DM9
Parties
Applicant
Mr Michael Dunning
Timeline
17 Jan 2024
Application submitted
14 Feb 2024
Application validated
16 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 17
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - FUL16 Apr 2026View ↗
1711-L90-200 Rev B17 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.117 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.1017 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.1117 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.1217 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.1317 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.1417 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.217 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.517 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.617 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.717 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.817 Jan 2024View ↗
2020.917 Jan 2024View ↗
Application Form (No personal data)17 Jan 2024View ↗
TGA.2487.TPP.002A17 Jan 2024View ↗
TGA.2487.TSP.00117 Jan 2024View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register.
Summary
Reference
24/00155/FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Mr Michael Dunning
Submitted
17 Jan 2024
Decision date
16 Apr 2026
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
117
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 109 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0