Development Intent
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesNorbiton - OLDApplication
Planning Application

22/00674/PAMA

Magnum House Unit C 164 London Road Kingston Upon Thames KT2 6QW

OtherNorbiton - OLD wardArea of Archaeological Significance: Name: Kingston Town Cen
Submission
15 Feb 2022
Target
10 May 2022
Decision
27 Apr 2022
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
27 Apr 2022
Decided by James Garside under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Prior notification of change of use of ground floor from commercial unit (Class E) to a two bed dwelling (Class C3)

Why it was refused
Reason 1

It has not been adequately demonstrated that the existing unit falls within any of the uses specified within MA.1(2)(a) or (b) and therefore the building does not benefit from the rights afforded by Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).

Reason 2

No mechanism has been secured to preclude residents from applying for on-street car parking permits in the Controlled Parking Zone or car club membership for future occupiers and so, in the absence of cogent evidence or assessment, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that overspill car parking from the site would not result in an unacceptable adverse impact on on-street car parking stress or result in an unacceptable adverse impact on highway safety, contrary to paragraph 111 of the NPPF, Policy T4 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies DM8, DM9 and DM10 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012).

Reason 3

The applicant has failed to demonstrate that sufficient and adequate cycle parking could be provided on site to accommodate the development, contrary to Policy T5 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DM8 of the Council's Core Strategy 2012 and the Sustainable Transport SPD 2013.

Reason 4

It has not been demonstrated through the submission of robust or cogent evidence, such as a full BRE complaint Daylight & Sunlight Assessment, that the proposed development would be provided with adequate natural light in all habitable rooms of the dwellinghouse, contrary to MA.2(2)(f) of Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).

Reason 5

It has not been demonstrated through the submission of cogent evidence that the proposed development would achieve minimum 2.3m floor to ceiling heights over 75% of the Gross Internal Area and that the proposed flats would comply with the nationally described space standard issued by the Department for Communities and Local Government on 27th March 2015, contrary to 3(9A), 'Permitted Development', of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).

Policies cited
T4
DM8
DM9
DM10
NPPF
T5
Parties
Applicant
CNM Estates
Timeline
15 Feb 2022
Application submitted
15 Mar 2022
Application validated
27 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 10
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - PAMA27 Apr 2022View ↗
Officer Report26 Apr 2022View ↗
670-CDA-Z1-00-DR-A-05-0201 Rev.02 - Proposed Rear Elevation14 Mar 2022View ↗
670-CDA-Z1-00-DR-A-00-0100 Rev.01 - Site Location Plan14 Mar 2022View ↗
670-CDA-Z1-XX-DR-A-01-0201 Rev.02 - Existing Rear Elevation14 Mar 2022View ↗
670-CDA-Z1-XX-DR-A-05-0200 Rev.02 - Proposed Front Elevation14 Mar 2022View ↗
670-CDA-Z1-XX-DR-A-01-0200 Rev.02 - Existing Front Elevation14 Mar 2022View ↗
Application Form15 Feb 2022View ↗
670-CDA-Z1-00-DR-A-05-0100 Rev.02 - Proposed Ground Floor Pl15 Feb 2022View ↗
670-CDA-Z1-00-DR-A-01-0100 Rev.02 - Existing Ground Floor Pl15 Feb 2022View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register.
Summary
Reference
22/00674/PAMA
Type
PA Class MA - Change from Class E to C3
Applicant
CNM Estates
Submitted
15 Feb 2022
Decision date
27 Apr 2022
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
10
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 2 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0