Development Intent
Planning AtlasHounslowSC4
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Hounslow · Local Plan · Policy

SC4 — Scale and density of new housing development.

How Hounslow actually applies SC4: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

SC4 is a published Hounslow planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Hounslow Local Plan (adopted)

Hounslow · SC4
Where SC4 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~2
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
14
times cited
in parsed decision notices
68%
appeal survival
21 dismissed · 10 allowed at appeal
5 of 22
officer reach
23% of officers recorded in this period
Hounslow West
top hotspot ward
2 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue SC4 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

SC4 appears most often in Hounslow West, Hounslow Heath, Turnham Green. It appears across 5 of 22 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
93%
in approvals
13 citations
0%
in refusals
0 citations

This shows the decision reports in which SC4 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 1 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why SC4 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
68% survival
21 dismissed · 10 allowed31 PINS appeal decisions cite SC4

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite SC4. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing SC4 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Hounslow
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Hounslow's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Hounslow decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.