Development Intent
Planning AtlasHillingdonRUISLIP 2022Application
Planning Application

16080/APP/2023/1357

26 BROADWOOD AVENUE RUISLIP

Full / Other PlanningRUISLIP 2022 ward
Submission
10 May 2023
Target
17 Jul 2023
Decision
14 Jul 2023
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
14 Jul 2023
Decided by Katherine Mills under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Erection of a front wall, two electric gates and a front porch. Existing pavers to be taken up and re-laid with additional soft landscaping (Application for a Certificate of Lawful Development for a Proposed Development)

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed development does not constitute permitted development by virtue of the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class D.1(b) and (c) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) as the ground area (measured externally) of the proposed front porch would exceed 3 sq.m.

Reason 2

The proposed development does not constitute permitted development by virtue of the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class D.1(c) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) as the proposed front porch would exceed 3 metres in height (measured from existing ground level).

Reason 3

The proposed development does not constitute permitted development by virtue of the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class F of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) as (a) the hard surface would be situated on land between a wall forming the principal elevation of the dwellinghouse and a highway, and (b) the area of ground covered by the hard surface, or the area of hard surface replaced, would exceed 5 square metres, no details have been provided to demonstate that the proposed hard standing would be made of porous materials, and no details have been provided as to how run-off water would be directed to the proposed planters and whether these planters would be at ground level, and so it has not been demonstated that there is provision to direct run-off water from the hard surface to a permeable or porous area or surface within the curtilage of the dwellinghouse.

Reason 4

The proposed development does not constitute permitted development by virtue of the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 2, Class A.1(a)(ii) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) as the height of any gate, fence, wall or means of enclosure erected or constructed adjacent to a highway used by vehicular traffic would, after the carrying out of the development, exceed 1m in height above ground level.

Reason 5

The proposed development does not constitute permitted development by virtue of the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 2, Class A.1(c) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) as the height of any gate, fence, wall or other means of enclosure maintained, improved or altered would, as a result of the development, exceed its former height or the height referred to in Class A paragraph (a) or (b) as the height appropriate to it if erected or constructed, whichever is the greater. This determination is based on your submitted plans. All measurements are taken from existing ground level.

Parties
Timeline
10 May 2023
Application submitted
22 May 2023
Application validated
14 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 9
APPLICATION FORMView ↗
LOCATION PLANView ↗
EXISTING PLANView ↗
EXISTING PLANView ↗
PROPOSED PLANView ↗
PROPOSED ELEVATIONSView ↗
PROPOSED ELEVATIONSView ↗
DECISION NOTICEView ↗
OFFICERS REPORTSView ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Hillingdon planning register.
Summary
Reference
16080/APP/2023/1357
Type
Planning Application
Applicant
Submitted
10 May 2023
Decision date
14 Jul 2023
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
How long, really
9
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 1 wks over the 8-week target