Development Intent
AtlasHarrowPolicyDM46
Planning AtlasHarrowDM46
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Harrow · Local Plan · Policy

DM46 — New Community, Sport and Education Facilities.

How Harrow actually applies DM46: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM46 is a published Harrow planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Harrow Local Plan (adopted)

Harrow · DM46
Where DM46 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~2
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
8
times cited
in parsed decision notices
4 appeals
appeal survival
4 dismissed · 0 allowed at appeal — too few to rate
5 of 39
officer reach
13% of officers recorded in this period
Roxeth
top hotspot ward
2 citations
What this policy is about

Policy DM46 supports proposals for refurbishing existing premises and building new community, sport and education facilities, especially in areas with a high demand, such as near schools and community centres.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

New Community, Sport and Education Facilities

Policy DM 46: New Community, Sport and Education Facilities A. Proposals for the refurbishment and re-use of existing premises for community, sport and educational facilities will be supported. B. Proposals for the provision of new community, sport and educational facilities will be supported where: There are currently 50 state funded primary schools and 10 secondary schools in Harrow, as well as a number of colleges and nonstate funded educational establishments. In addition, Harrow’s PPG 17 Study (2010) records that there are 40 community centres and halls in the Borough, although a number of these were considered by users to be in a poor condition.

Verbatim from the adopted Harrow plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
0% in approvals · 100% in refusals
8 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Roxeth2
Harrow Weald2
Stanmore2
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM46 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM46 appears most often in Roxeth, Harrow Weald, Stanmore. It appears across 5 of 39 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
0%
in approvals
0 citations
100%
in refusals
8 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM46 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM46 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
survival
4 dismissed · 0 allowed4 PINS appeal decisions cite DM46

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM46. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. Too few decisive appeals for a rate — the counts are the record. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM46 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Harrow
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Harrow's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Harrow decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.