Development Intent
AtlasHarrowPolicyDM44
Planning AtlasHarrowDM44
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Harrow · Local Plan · Policy

DM44 — Servicing.

How Harrow actually applies DM44: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM44 is a published Harrow planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Harrow Local Plan (adopted)

Harrow · DM44
Where DM44 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~6
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
24
times cited
in parsed decision notices
3 appeals
appeal survival
3 dismissed · 0 allowed at appeal — too few to rate
12 of 39
officer reach
31% of officers recorded in this period
Stanmore
top hotspot ward
6 citations
What this policy is about

Policy DM44 requires new developments to retain and effectively use existing servicing facilities, and manage on-street servicing to make efficient use of Harrow's road capacity.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Servicing

Policy DM 44: Servicing Development Management POLICIES • Harrow’s Transport Study (2010) enable the development to proceed. London Plan Policy 6.11 Smoothing Traffic Flow and Tackling Congestion requires boroughs to develop a package of measures which contribute to the objective of traffic flow and congestion management. The retention and effective use of existing servicing facilities, and the management of on-street servicing, will help to make the most efficient use of Harrow’s finite road capacity.

Verbatim from the adopted Harrow plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
50% in approvals · 50% in refusals
24 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Stanmore6
Canons2
Belmont2
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM44 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM44 appears most often in Stanmore, Canons, Belmont. It appears across 12 of 39 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
50%
in approvals
12 citations
50%
in refusals
12 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM44 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM44 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
survival
3 dismissed · 0 allowed3 PINS appeal decisions cite DM44

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM44. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. Too few decisive appeals for a rate — the counts are the record. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM44 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Harrow
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Harrow's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Harrow decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.