Development Intent
AtlasHarrowPolicyDM32
Planning AtlasHarrowDM32
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Harrow · Local Plan · Policy

DM32 — Office Development.

How Harrow actually applies DM32: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM32 is a published Harrow planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Harrow Local Plan (adopted)

Harrow · DM32
Where DM32 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~1
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
2
times cited
in parsed decision notices
2 appeals
appeal survival
2 dismissed · 0 allowed at appeal — too few to rate
2 of 39
officer reach
5% of officers recorded in this period
Kenton East
top hotspot ward
1 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM32 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM32 appears most often in Kenton East, Wealdstone North. It appears across 2 of 39 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
0%
in approvals
0 citations
100%
in refusals
2 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM32 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM32 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
survival
2 dismissed · 0 allowed2 PINS appeal decisions cite DM32

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM32. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. Too few decisive appeals for a rate — the counts are the record. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM32 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Harrow
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Harrow's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Harrow decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.