Development Intent
AtlasHarrowPolicyDM21
Planning AtlasHarrowDM21
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Harrow · Local Plan · Policy

DM21 — Enhancement of Biodiversity and Access to Nature.

How Harrow actually applies DM21: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM21 is a published Harrow planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Harrow Local Plan (adopted)

Harrow · DM21
Where DM21 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~5
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
30
times cited
in parsed decision notices
4 appeals
appeal survival
3 dismissed · 1 allowed at appeal — too few to rate
14 of 39
officer reach
36% of officers recorded in this period
Stanmore
top hotspot ward
5 citations
What this policy is about

Policy DM21 requires development proposals to enhance locally important habitats and support species, restoring and recreating natural environments. This applies to all development proposals in Harrow. The council will seek opportunities for green corridors, green chains, gardens with wildlife planting, green roofs, and green walls.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Enhancement of Biodiversity and Access to Nature

Policy DM 21: Enhancement of Biodiversity and Access to Nature A. Opportunities to enhance locally important habitats and to support locally important species will be sought in accordance with the Harrow Biodiversity Action Plan. Where possible, proposals should secure the restoration and re-creation of significant components of the natural environment as part of the design and layout of development. Particular attention will be paid to: 05: OPEN SPACE AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT a. green corridors and green chains, including the potential to extend or add to the network; b. gardens, including planting for wildlife, green roofs and green walls;

Verbatim from the adopted Harrow plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
47% in approvals · 53% in refusals
30 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Stanmore5
Roxeth5
Canons3
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM21 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM21 appears most often in Stanmore, Roxeth, Canons. It appears across 14 of 39 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
47%
in approvals
14 citations
53%
in refusals
16 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM21 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM21 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
survival
3 dismissed · 1 allowed4 PINS appeal decisions cite DM21

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM21. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. Too few decisive appeals for a rate — the counts are the record. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM21 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Harrow
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Harrow's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Harrow decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.