Development Intent
AtlasHarrowPolicyDM10
Planning AtlasHarrowDM10
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Harrow · Local Plan · Policy

DM10 — On Site Water Management and Surface Water Attenuation.

How Harrow actually applies DM10: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM10 is a published Harrow planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Harrow Local Plan (adopted)

Harrow · DM10
Where DM10 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~17
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
118
times cited
in parsed decision notices
57%
appeal survival
8 dismissed · 6 allowed at appeal
21 of 39
officer reach
54% of officers recorded in this period
Stanmore
top hotspot ward
17 citations
What this policy is about

Policy DM10 requires new developments to efficiently use mains water and control surface water runoff. It applies to all new development proposals and substantial weight will be given to achieving mains water consumption of 105 litres or less per person per day and greenfield runoff rates. The council will resist proposals that do not justify not achieving greenfield runoff rates and will support proposals that use sustainable drainage measures, separate surface and foul water systems, and make provision for flood water storage and management.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

On Site Water Management and Surface Water Attenuation

Policy DM 10: On Site Water Management and Surface Water Attenuation A. Proposals for new development will be required to make provision for the installation and management of measures for the efficient use of mains water and for the control and reduction of surface water run off. Substantial weight will be afforded to the target for mains water consumption of 105 litres or less per person per day and to the achievement of greenfield run off rates. Where greenfield run- off rates cannot be achieved this should be clearly justified by the applicant; however the fact that a site is previously developed and has an existing high run-off rate will not constitute justification. B. The design and layout of major development proposals will be required to: a. use appropriate sustainable drainage measures to control the rate and volume of surface water run-off; b. ensure separation of surface and foul water systems; c. make reasonable provision for the safe storage and passage of flood water in excessive events; and d. demonstrate adequate arrangements for the management and maintenance of the measures used. Examples include Headstone Manor Recreation Ground, Harrow Recreation Ground, Pinner Park Farm, Newton Park (east) and Queensbury Recreation Ground. Some open spaces have been adapted specifically to function as flood storage areas, such as the open space at Stanmore Park, Whitchurch Playing Fields and Prince Edward Playing Fields, whilst the Core Strategy recognises the potential of Kenton Recreation Ground to provide a sustainable flood management solution for more urban areas up and downstream of the Wealdstone Brook. Harrow’s Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Management Plan. The Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan (Environment Agency, 2009) includes Harrow in sub area 9: London catchments where it is accepted that the most sustainable approach to managing flood risk is through adaptation of the urban environment Development Management POLICIES Some of the Borough’s open spaces contain river corridors and form a part of the functional flood plain(11). The modelled flood extents illustrated on Harrow’s flood maps represents the best available information about the strategic risk of flooding. Due regard must be given to areas shown as falling within the functional floodplain, which represents the most frequent and serious risk of flooding. However for the purposes of applying the National Planning Framework (paragraphs 100-104) and associated Technical Guidance, a distinction will be made between Greenfield Zone 3b and Developed Zone 3b. Undeveloped floodplain, defined as zone 3b flood extents within areas designated as Green Belt, Metropolitan Open Land or open space on the Policies Map, is of particularly high value within the urban context. It provides unimpeded space where water is able to flow or be stored during times of flood. However, as recognised in flood management plans(12), much of the Borough is already urbanised with many rivers culverted, changing their behaviour in response to rainfall and flooding. Previously developed land within the floodplain, defined as Developed Zone 3B flood extents on land not designated as Green Belt, Metropolitan Open Land or open space on the Policies Map, provides the opportunity through redevelopment to realise the flood risk management and reduction objectives of Harrow’s Core Strategy and the Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan. However, Zone 3B represents land where water has to flow or be stored in times of flood and it therefore remains essential that development in this zone is designed to be safe and does not simply displace flood risk to land elsewhere.

Verbatim from the adopted Harrow plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
35% in approvals · 65% in refusals
118 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Stanmore17
Harrow Weald9
Pinner South9
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM10 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM10 appears most often in Stanmore, Harrow Weald, Pinner South. It appears across 21 of 39 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
35%
in approvals
41 citations
65%
in refusals
77 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM10 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM10 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
57% survival
8 dismissed · 6 allowed14 PINS appeal decisions cite DM10

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM10. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM10 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Harrow
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Harrow's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Harrow decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.