Development Intent
AtlasHarrowCouncillorsHoney_jamie
Planning AtlasHarrowHoney Jamie
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Harrow

Honey Jamie.

A Labour member in Harrow.

Labour
Harrow · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
31
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Heritage
8
Character
8
Bulk mass
8
Height
8
Conservation
6
Design
3
Amenity space
2
Amenity
1
Subscribe to see what Honey Jamie raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
8
Ward support
3

How Honey Jamie acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Honey Jamie moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

110 of 11
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Ward support
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Ward support
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Show all 10 rows
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
Planning Committee
2018-07-25
At a glance
PartyLabour
Planning committeeNo
CouncilHarrow
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Harrow planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 0 of their 31 interventions (0%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.