Development Intent
Planning AtlasHarrowHeadstoneApplication
Planning Application

PL/0493/26

84 George V Avenue, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 5SW

Full / Other PlanningHeadstone ward
Submission
25 Feb 2026
Target
27 Apr 2026
Decision
27 Apr 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
27 Apr 2026
Decided by Germaine Asabere under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Redevelopment to provide single-storey self-contained studio dwelling to the rear of 84 George V Avenue (demolition of outbuilding); parking; landscaping; separate amenity space; new access; bin and cycle stores

Why it was refused
Reason 1

- The proposed new dwelling, by reason of its poor design, size, scale, proportions and siting would appear contrived, cramped and out of keeping with the wider pattern of development to the detriment of the character and appearance of the streetscene, and the pattern of development within the surrounding area. The proposal would therefore be contrary to the high-quality design aspirations of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3 and D6 of The London Plan (2021), Policies GR1 and GR10 of Harrow Local Plan 2021 – 2041 and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).

Reason 2

- The proposed dwelling, by reason of its constrained site characteristics, layout and proximity to site boundaries, would result in a substandard form of accommodation for future occupiers, and detrimental impact on neighbouring residents. As a result, the proposal would fail to provide an acceptable living environment for all and would be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policy GR1 of Harrow Local Plan (2021 – 2041) and the adopted Residential Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2010).

Reason 3

- Car parking cannot be satisfactorily provided within the curtilage of the site to meet the Council's requirements in respect of the development, and the likely increase in on- street parking on the neighbouring highways would be detrimental to the free flow and safety on the neighbouring highways and the amenity of neighbouring residents, contrary to National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy T6 of The London Plan (2021), Policies GR1 and M2 of Harrow Local Plan (2021 - 2041) and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide (2010).

Reason 4

- Insufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed development would not have any adverse impact on the protected species, contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), policy G6 of the London Plan (2021) and GI3 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021-2041).

Reason 5

- In the absence of a Section 106 agreement, the proposal fails to demonstrate how it would achieve the statutory minimum 10% Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG), as required by the Environment Act 2021. In the absence of this information, the Local Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that the development would not result in a net loss of biodiversity or that it would deliver the required net gain. The proposal is therefore contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy G6 of the London Plan (2021) and policy GI3 of the Harrow Local Plan (2021 - 2041).

Policies cited
D3
D6
GR1
GR10
NPPF
T6
M2
G6
GI3
Parties
Applicant
Mr Raza Kirmani
Timeline
25 Feb 2026
Application submitted
2 Mar 2026
Application validated
27 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 11
Decision Notice27 Apr 2026View ↗
HIGHWAYS comments27 Apr 2026View ↗
Officer Report24 Apr 2026View ↗
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS17 Mar 2026View ↗
CIL Form1 Mar 2026View ↗
Fire Safety1 Mar 2026View ↗
Spatial analysis results (Created from GIS)26 Feb 2026View ↗
Tree Report26 Feb 2026View ↗
Design & Access Statement26 Feb 2026View ↗
Proposed Floor Plans & Elevation(s)26 Feb 2026View ↗
Application Form Redacted26 Feb 2026View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Harrow planning register.
Summary
Reference
PL/0493/26
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Mr Raza Kirmani
Submitted
25 Feb 2026
Decision date
27 Apr 2026
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
9
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 1 wks over the 8-week target