SP11 — Design.
How Haringey actually applies SP11: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.
SP11 is a published Haringey planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.
Cited under: Haringey Local Plan (adopted)
Policy SP11 requires all new development in Haringey to be of high quality, attractive, sustainable, safe and easy to use. This includes respecting local context and character, minimising environmental impacts, and promoting social inclusion. The council will resist design that is inappropriate to its context or fails to improve the area's character and quality.
Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.
Design
Verbatim from the adopted Haringey plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.
2,583 citations in the selected period
Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue SP11 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.
SP11 appears most often in Highgate, South Tottenham, Fortis Green. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.
Needs each citation joined to the case officer who wrote it — arrives with officer-report parsing for Haringey.
This shows the decision reports in which SP11 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 1 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.
Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why SP11 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.
From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite SP11. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing SP11 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.
Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.