Planning committee member · Parsons Green & Sandford, Hammersmith And Fulham
Adrian Pascu-Tulbure.
A Conservative member representing Parsons Green & Sandford in Hammersmith And Fulham. Sits on the planning committee, with 154 recorded interventions — voting with the officer recommendation 100% of the time. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Parsons Green & Sandford itself.
ConservativeParsons Green & Sandford wardPlanning committee
Hammersmith And Fulham · Adrian Pascu-Tulbure's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
154
Interventions
at committee
108
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Procedural
13
Commercial
10
Traffic
7
Highways
7
Parking
3
Noise
3
Waste
3
Construction
2
Subscribe to see what Adrian Pascu-Tulbure raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Seconded
26
Raised concern
7
procedural
6
Requested condition
3
Declared interest
3
Questioned
1
How Adrian Pascu-Tulbure acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Adrian Pascu-Tulbure moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 37
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Show all 10 rows
At a glance
PartyConservative
WardParsons Green & Sandford
Planning committeeMember
CouncilHammersmith And Fulham
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Hammersmith And Fulham planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 150 of their 154 interventions (97%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.