Development Intent
Planning AtlasHammersmith And FulhamPalace RiversideApplication
Planning Application

2020/01261/FUL

Bishop's Park Tennis Courts Bishop's Avenue London

Full / Other PlanningPalace Riverside ward
Submission
22 May 2020
Target
3 Aug 2023
Decision
3 Aug 2020
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
3 Aug 2020
Decided by James Carleton under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Retention of fencing and glass surrounds within the existing tennis court area to create 3no. padel/mini tennis courts.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposal is considered unacceptable on the grounds of visual amenity. More particularly, the addition of enclosures to the padel court perimeter fence by virtue of their design, scale, obscure materials with advertisement signage introduce a discordant feature which has an adverse impact on the visual permeability of this open space (Metropolitan Open Land) and would fail to preserve or enhance the Bishops Park Conservation Area. In this respect, the proposal is contrary to Policies DC1, DC8, OS1, OS2, RTC3, of the Local Plan (2018) and Key Principles AH1, AH2 and CAG3 of the Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (2018). Chief Planning Officer of The Economy Department : Joanne Woodward

Reason 2

The proposal is unacceptable on the grounds of residential amenity. The application site is in close proximity to nearby residential properties at Bishops Mansions in Bishop Park Road and it is considered that the existing use has a harmful impact in terms of nuisance, noise and disturbance. The Noise Impact Assessment does not not include sufficient information to draw robust conclusions regarding the regular use of the padel courts. The proposal is contrary to Policies DC1, CF3, CC11, CC13 of the Local Plan (2018) and Key Principle NN1 and NN2 of the Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (2018). Joanne Woodward, Chief Planning Officer of The Economy Department Duly authorised by the Council to sign this notice. Note: Refer to the Statement of Applicants’ Rights and general information enclosed. Page 2 2020/01261/FUL LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 STATEMENT OF APPLICANTS’ RIGHTS arising from the refusal of planning permission 1 An applicant aggrieved by the accompanying decision may

Policies cited
AH1
AH2
CAG3
DC1
CF3
CC11
CC13
NN1
NN2
Parties
Applicant
Mr Chris Warren
Agent
Timeline
22 May 2020
Application submitted
26 May 2020
Application validated
3 Aug 2020
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 11
SUPPORTING-STATEMENT-BP-2020View ↗
SFPD-REF-NR-2018-CAS-080-BISHOPS-PARK-T.C.-DWG-015-10052019View ↗
SFPD-REF-NR-2018-CAS-080-BISHOPS-PARK-T.C.-DWG-013-10052019View ↗
SFPD-REF-NR-2018-CAS-080-BISHOPS-PARK-T.C.-DWG-010-10052019View ↗
SFPD-REF-NR-2018-CAS-080-BISHOPS-PARK-T.C.-DWG-011-10052019View ↗
SFPD-REF-NR-2018-CAS-080-BISHOPS-PARK-T.C.-DWG-014-10052019View ↗
SFPD-REF-NR-2018-CAS-080-BISHOPS-PARK-T.C.-DWG-016-10052019View ↗
NOISE-IMPACTView ↗
OFFICER-S-FILE-NOTEView ↗
BISHOP-PARK-TENNIS-COURTS-View ↗
DECISION-NOTICEView ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register.
Summary
Reference
2020/01261/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Mr Chris Warren
Submitted
22 May 2020
Decision date
3 Aug 2020
Decision
Refused
Decision route
How long, really
10
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 2 wks over the 8-week target