Development Intent
Planning AtlasPlanning InspectorateHammersmith And Fulham appealsis 2024/02669/
Hammersmith And Fulham · Planning appeal · 2025-12-16

Appeal — is 2024/02669/

Appeal dismissedthe council was upheld
Originating application — is 2024/02669/

Hammersmith And Fulham refused is 2024/02669/; the applicant appealed to the Planning Inspectorate. Hammersmith And Fulham decisions →

Winning arguments — policies cited
W6D8DC1DC8DC9DC10s.72
From the decision letter

Appeal Decisions Site visit made on 25 November 2025 by K Lancaster BA (hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 16 December 2025 Appeal A Ref: APP/H5390/W/25/3373752 Telephone Box Outside Hammersmith Palais, 242 Shepherd's Bush Road, Hammersmith And Fulham, London W6 7NL • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant planning permission. The appeal is made by Mr Nathan Still on behalf of IN FOCUS NETWORK LIMITED against the decision of the Council of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. The application Ref is 2024/02669/FUL. The development proposed is the installation of a new telephone kiosk to replace existing. • • • Appeal B Ref: APP/H5390/H/25/3373751 Telephone Box Outside Hammersmith Palais, 242 Shepherd's Bush Road, Hammersmith And Fulham, London W6 7NL • The …

At a glance
OutcomeDismissed
Applicationis 2024/02669/
Appeal ref3373752
Decided2025-12-16
The inspector
K Lancaster

The Planning Inspectorate inspector who decided this appeal.

From the Planning Inspectorate's published decision letter for appeal 3373752. The originating application reference and site are extracted from the letter. “Winning arguments” are the development-plan policies the inspector cited.