Development Intent
AtlasHackneyPolicyLP3
Planning AtlasHackneyLP3
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Hackney · Local Plan · Policy

LP3 — Designated Heritage Assets.

How Hackney actually applies LP3: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

LP3 is a published Hackney planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Hackney Local Plan (adopted)

Hackney · LP3
Where LP3 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~11
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
56
times cited
in parsed decision notices
61%
appeal survival
63 dismissed · 40 allowed at appeal
20 of 41
officer reach
49% of officers recorded in this period
De Beauvoir Ward
top hotspot ward
11 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue LP3 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

LP3 appears most often in De Beauvoir Ward, London Fields Ward, Clissold Ward. It appears across 20 of 41 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
23%
in approvals
13 citations
77%
in refusals
43 citations

This shows the decision reports in which LP3 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why LP3 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
61% survival
63 dismissed · 40 allowed · 1 split104 PINS appeal decisions cite LP3

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite LP3. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing LP3 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Hackney
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Hackney's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Hackney decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.