Development Intent
AtlasHackneyPolicyLP1
Planning AtlasHackneyLP1
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Hackney · Local Plan · Policy

LP1 — Part A will be applied having regard to the scale and location of the.

How Hackney actually applies LP1: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

LP1 is a published Hackney planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Hackney Local Plan (adopted)

Hackney · LP1
Where LP1 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~19
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
149
times cited
in parsed decision notices
62%
appeal survival
117 dismissed · 73 allowed at appeal
32 of 41
officer reach
78% of officers recorded in this period
Springfield Ward
top hotspot ward
19 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue LP1 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

LP1 appears most often in Springfield Ward, Stoke Newington Ward, Lea Bridge Ward. It appears across 32 of 41 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
24%
in approvals
36 citations
76%
in refusals
113 citations

This shows the decision reports in which LP1 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why LP1 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
62% survival
117 dismissed · 73 allowed · 1 split191 PINS appeal decisions cite LP1

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite LP1. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing LP1 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Hackney
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Hackney's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Hackney decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.