Development Intent
Planning AtlasHackneyHackney Central WardApplication
Planning Application

2022/3051

Glory Phone, 377 Mare Street, Hackney, London, E8 1HY

Full / Other PlanningHackney Central Ward ward
Submission
19 Dec 2022
Target
10 Apr 2023
Decision
10 Apr 2023
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
10 Apr 2023
Decided by Gerard Livett under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Erection of two-storey rear extension at first and second floor levels; erection of mansard-style roof extension; conversion of extended upper floors into two self-contained dwellings accessed from Gould Terrace

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed extensions would represent disproportionate and inappropriate additions to the host building that would overwhelm and subsume the host building and would fail to respect the pattern of development in the area, to the detriment of the visual amenity of the host building that would neither preserve nor enhance the character and appearance of this part of the Clapton Square Conservation Area. As such the proposal is contrary to policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) D4 (Delivering good design) and HC1 (Heritage conservation and growth) of the London Plan 2021, policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) and LP3 (Designated Heritage Assets) of the Hackney Local Plan 2020 and the recommendations of the Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Extensions and Alterations 2009 and the Clapton Square Conservation Area Appraisal 2007.

Reason 2

The proposal, by reason of the additional bulk of the building, would result in it having an overbearing appearance and give rise to perceptions of an increased sense of enclosure and appearance of bulk when viewed from neighbouring properties and also give rise to loss of light to neighbouring buildings, to the detriment of the amenity of neighbouring residential occupiers. As such the proposal is contrary to policy D4 (Delivering good design) of the London Plan 2021 and policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) and LP2 (Development and Amenity) of the Hackney Local Plan 2020.

Reason 3

The proposal, by reason of the provision of rear balconies, would give rise to unacceptable levels of overlooking of neighbouring properties, to the detriment of the amenity of neighbouring residential occupiers. As such the proposal is contrary to policy D4 (Delivering good design) of the London Plan 2021 and policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) and LP2 (Development and Amenity) of the Hackney Local Plan 2020.

Parties
Applicant
David West
Timeline
19 Dec 2022
Application submitted
13 Feb 2023
Application validated
10 Apr 2023
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 11
uploads/3152300281681206936:: ::2022 3051 Del Report11 Apr 2023View ↗
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final10 Apr 2023View ↗
Section - Proposed20 Dec 2022View ↗
Elevation (Side) - Proposed20 Dec 2022View ↗
Floor plan20 Dec 2022View ↗
Elevation (Front) - Existing20 Dec 2022View ↗
Floor Plan - Existing20 Dec 2022View ↗
Community Infrastructure Levy - Completed form20 Dec 2022View ↗
Design and access statement20 Dec 2022View ↗
The location plan20 Dec 2022View ↗
Application Form - Without Personal Data20 Dec 2022View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Hackney planning register.
Summary
Reference
2022/3051
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
David West
Submitted
19 Dec 2022
Decision date
10 Apr 2023
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
16
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 8 wks over the 8-week target