Development Intent
AtlasEnfieldOfficersSyndsey Ballet
Planning Atlas›Enfield›Syndsey Ballet
Case officer · Enfield Planning

Syndsey Ballet.

Last recorded decision Nov 2023 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Enfield with an approval rate of 53% across 23 decided planning applications, spanning 12 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer23 decisions53% approvalSave
Enfield · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
23
Applications
2021–23
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%63%202245%2023
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate53% · 56th of 63
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Syndsey Ballet's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Syndsey Ballet decided — 18 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
9 times cited
D3London Plan
8 times cited
D4London Plan
8 times cited
CP30MAINTAINING AND IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE BUILT AND OPEN ENVIRONMENT All developments and interventions in the public realm must be high quality and design-lEnfield plan
8 times cited
DMD6SPD / guidance
7 times cited
DMD37SPD / guidance
7 times cited
DMD8SPD / guidance
6 times cited
D6London Plan
5 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
5
100%
3
67%
3
33%
2
100%
2
50%
2
0%
1
–
1
0%
1
0%
1
–
1
–
1
0%
5
100%
3
67%
3
33%
Show all 12 rows
2
100%
2
50%
2
0%
1
–
1
0%
1
0%
1
–
1
–
1
0%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–23.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
23/03462/FUL
Full
Approved
2023-12-15
23/02514/FUL
Full
Refused
2023-12-12
23/03462/FUL
Full
Approved
2023-12-15
23/02514/FUL
Full
Refused
2023-12-12
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 23 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Quod
2. DRK Planning Ltd
3. PAD Architectural Consultants
4. Dalcour Maclaren
At a glance
OfficerSyndsey Ballet
BoroughEnfield
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications23 (2021–23)
Approval rate53%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Enfield planning register and published decision notices, 2021–23. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Enfield decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.