Development Intent
AtlasEnfieldOfficersMaria Demetri
Planning Atlas›Enfield›Maria Demetri
Case officer · Enfield Planning

Maria Demetri.

Active — last recorded decision Feb 2026

A case officer at Enfield with an approval rate of 67% across 106 decided planning applications, spanning 15 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer106 decisions67% approvalSave
Enfield · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
106
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%46%202066%202171%202267%2024100%2025
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate67% · 41st of 63
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Maria Demetri's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Maria Demetri decided — 73 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
37 times cited
CP30MAINTAINING AND IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE BUILT AND OPEN ENVIRONMENT All developments and interventions in the public realm must be high quality and design-lEnfield plan
28 times cited
DMD37SPD / guidance
20 times cited
DMD8SPD / guidance
17 times cited
DMD6SPD / guidance
16 times cited
CP21DELIVERING SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTUREEnfield plan
14 times cited
CP4HOUSING QUALITY New housingEnfield plan
13 times cited
D4London Plan
13 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
14
50%
14
57%
11
91%
11
80%
10
70%
7
71%
7
71%
6
33%
6
80%
6
50%
4
67%
3
100%
3
67%
3
67%
1
–
14
50%
14
57%
11
91%
Show all 15 rows
11
80%
10
70%
7
71%
7
71%
6
33%
6
80%
6
50%
4
67%
3
100%
3
67%
3
67%
1
–

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
24/03470/FUL
Full
Approved
2025-12-16
25/01246/FUL
Full
Approved
2025-06-18
24/03470/FUL
Full
Approved
2025-12-16
25/01246/FUL
Full
Approved
2025-06-18
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 106 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Intelliarch Ltd
2. Savills (UK) Ltd
3. Harlequin Group
4. CG Architects
At a glance
OfficerMaria Demetri
BoroughEnfield
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications106 (2020–26)
Approval rate67%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Enfield planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Enfield decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.