Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldPonders EndApplication
Planning Application

26/00703/FUL

Unit 1- 3 And 44- 46 Redburn Industrial Estate Woodall Road Enfield EN3 4LE

Full / Other PlanningPonders End wardLondon Heathrow Airport: Maximum Height Level: All buildings
Submission
23 Feb 2026
Target
28 May 2026
Decision
27 May 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
27 May 2026
Decided by Samuel Wong under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Conversion of existing light industrial (E(g)(iii)) and storage/distribution (B8) units into 3x units, involving rear extension.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposal would not offer a mechanism to deliver the statutory Biodviersity Net Gain. The proposal would therefore contrary to Schedule 7A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (inserted by the Environment Act 2021), Policy G6 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CS36 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and Policies DMD78 and DMD 79 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 27 May 2026 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer samuel.wong@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan LIVARCH/1WR/110 Rev A Existing Site Plan LIVARCH/1WR/108 Rev A Proposed Site Plan LIVARCH/1WR/109 Rev A Existing Plans LIVARCH/1WR/101 Rev A Proposed Plans LIVARCH/1WR/102 Rev A Existing Elevations (Front & Rear) LIVARCH/1WR/103 Rev A Existing Elevations (Side 01 & 02) LIVARCH/1WR/104 Rev A Proposed Elevations (Front & Rear) LIVARCH/1WR/105 Rev A Proposed Elevations (Side 01 & 02) LIVARCH/1WR/106 Rev A Existing & Proposed Roof Plans LIVARCH/1WR/107 Rev A Existing & Proposed Sections LIVARCH/1WR/111 Rev A Design and Access Statement prepared by Livarch Planning Statement prepared by Livarch Fire Safety Strategy Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) Report QFRA 2882 Rev 1.0 prepared by UK Flood Risk dated 02 Apri Phase 1 Environmental Report 3220-P1E-1 prepared by GO Contaminated Land Solutions dated 19 March 20 APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
G6
CS36
DMD78
DMD79
Parties
Applicant
Ellerman Vision
Timeline
23 Feb 2026
Application submitted
2 Apr 2026
Application validated
27 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 25
Decision Notice27 May 2026View ↗
suds report2 Apr 2026View ↗
Environmental report - phase 123 Mar 2026View ↗
Environmental report - phase 1 - 1/523 Mar 2026View ↗
Environmental report - phase 1 - 2/523 Mar 2026View ↗
Environmental report - phase 1 - 3/523 Mar 2026View ↗
Environmental report - phase 1 - 4/523 Mar 2026View ↗
Environmental report - phase 1 - 5/523 Mar 2026View ↗
Preliminary Contaminated Land Assessment23 Mar 2026View ↗
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA18 Mar 2026View ↗
EXISTING & PROPOSED SECTION18 Mar 2026View ↗
CIL FORM 123 Feb 2026View ↗
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS23 Feb 2026View ↗
PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS23 Feb 2026View ↗
EXISTING FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS23 Feb 2026View ↗
EXISTING SIDE ELEVATIONS23 Feb 2026View ↗
PROPOSED FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS23 Feb 2026View ↗
PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATIONS23 Feb 2026View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED ROOF PLANS23 Feb 2026View ↗
EXISTING SITE PLAN23 Feb 2026View ↗
PROPOSED SITE PLAN23 Feb 2026View ↗
The location plan23 Feb 2026View ↗
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT23 Feb 2026View ↗
FIRE SAFETY STRATEGY23 Feb 2026View ↗
Planning statement23 Feb 2026View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
26/00703/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Ellerman Vision
Submitted
23 Feb 2026
Decision date
27 May 2026
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
13
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 5 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1