Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldCarterhatchApplication
Planning Application

25/04159/HOU

31 Boleyn Avenue Enfield EN1 4HR

HouseholderCarterhatch wardLondon Heathrow Airport: Maximum Height Level: All buildings
Submission
3 Dec 2025
Target
16 Feb 2026
Decision
13 Feb 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
13 Feb 2026
Decided by Aaron Hawkins under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

First floor rear extension.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed first floor extension by reason of its size and flat roof design, would be an obtrusive and incongruous form of development that would result in harm to the character and appearance of the subject dwelling and would be detrimental to the visual amenity of the immediately surrounding area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and policies DMD11, DMD13 and DMD37 of the Development Management Document (2014)

Reason 2

The proposed first floor rear extension by reason of its size, siting, depth, and height, would have an overbearing effect upon the adjoining property Number 33 Boleyn Avenue, and would result in a loss of light, outlook, and a heightened sense of enclosure, detrimental to the amenities of the neighbouring occupier. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), and policies DMD11 and DMD37 of the Development Management Document (2014) Dated: 13 February 2026 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer aaron.hawkins@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing EXG LOC PLAN 0 Drawing EXG PLANS 1 Drawing EXG ELEV 2 Drawing SECTION N 6 Drawing PRO PLANS 3 Drawing PRO ELEV 4 Drawing SECTION K Drawing Cover Letter Supporting Information Block Plan Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
CP30
DMD11
DMD13
DMD37
Parties
Applicant
Mr Sali LUMAZ
Timeline
3 Dec 2025
Application submitted
22 Dec 2025
Application validated
13 Feb 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 13
Decision Notice13 Feb 2026View ↗
CIL Form 129 Dec 2025View ↗
Block Plan29 Dec 2025View ↗
Existing Section29 Dec 2025View ↗
Proposed Section29 Dec 2025View ↗
Application Form - Without Personal Data3 Dec 2025View ↗
EXISTING LOCATION PLAN3 Dec 2025View ↗
LOCATION PLAN3 Dec 2025View ↗
EXISTING GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR LOFT3 Dec 2025View ↗
EXISTING FRONT REAR SIDE ELEVATIONS3 Dec 2025View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR LOFT3 Dec 2025View ↗
PROPOSED REAR AND SIDE ELEVATIONS3 Dec 2025View ↗
COVERING LETTER3 Dec 2025View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
25/04159/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Mr Sali LUMAZ
Submitted
3 Dec 2025
Decision date
13 Feb 2026
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
10
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 2 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0